Well, I liked the one where he “refutes” the view that marriage is the union between a man and a woman by asking the question, “Who says?”
Shoot. He’s got us! Let’s keep pulling the thread. WHO says rape is wrong? It’s got a hell of a lot more evolutionary benefit than gay marriage, so from the perspective of godlessness it’s a LOT more “moral” than gay marriage! WHO says murder is wrong? Don’t animals kill each other? Why shouldn’t I be able to blow my next door neighbor away for playing that crap he calls ‘music’ so loud?
WHO says marriage is between a man and a woman? Ask the question another way: when has anyone in history up to this point said that marriage was ever between a man and a man? What is the history of “gay marriage”? I came across some pro-gay articles that said “the tradition of gay marriage has been with us since the Roman Empire.” So I started looking and found a SINGLE account in Nero’s day by Seutonius.
http://cafesda.blogspot.com/2008/10/same-sex-marriage-and-roman-empire.html It isn’t exactly flattering, is it? Basically this emperor was so evil, so insane, so homicidal, and so completely depraved, that he even stooped to this kind of garbage. If this is the model for gay marriage and society, let’s put it out there: gay marriage leads to the total disaster of civilization, as evidenced by it’s first practice during the time of Nero. Nero was also a flagrant pedophile, according to Seutonius, so the least we can do is legalize the molesting of all our young boys, as well.
Restricting the definition of marriage is not “inappropriate” discrimination. As a matter of fact, the word DISCRIMINATION doesn’t even apply because there is no such thing legally, culturally, socially or linguistically as a marriage that is not between a man and a woman. Gay marriage is an invention by people of the moral caliber of Nero.
You want gay marriage? Fine. I want to kill and eat people. WHO SAYS I shouldn’t be allowed to kill and eat people? It’s certainly got more historical precedent than gay marriage, and the evidence suggests it’s less destructive for society, too.
The pat answer used by some homosexual proponents is that "it occurs in nature", so do rape, incest, cannibalism, and interspecies sex.
But the dirty little secret is that the sex positive agenda doesn't care about science or civilization, it seeks to end ALL moral judgements over all sexual pairings. Saying that it is "genetic" or "natural" are just to get people on board to accept it. In the end, they don't think it is any of your prudish business to comment on where they put their willies.
If you want to kill and eat people (I know you are being facitious here), then you should publicly appeal to abortionists for the “waste product”. After all, there are couples who eat the placenta (even vegans will eat it since it does not victimize animals). If it is “not” a baby, then there should be no shock or horror among the abortionists you ask.
We've already lost some excellent words in the past, including "liberal" (political liberals of today are anything but liberal) so I would hate to lose the word "marriage" too. It's worth fighting for.
Great link. Thanks.