Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Comments from an Obama voter (not trolling ) You've had your fun, ZOT!
Traviswf

Posted on 11/07/2008 10:40:35 AM PST by Traviswf

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 401-420421-440441-460 ... 641-658 next last
To: roses of sharon

BUMP to 111


421 posted on 11/07/2008 3:20:55 PM PST by AmericanGirlRising (RINO Hunting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Mr Inviso

Abu Nidal was killed on the orders of Saddam Hussein in 2002. The Iraqis claim that he killed himself. Either way, he wasn’t a threat to anyone in 2003 when we invaded.

Try again.


422 posted on 11/07/2008 3:25:33 PM PST by Mr. Know It All (Quicumque vult salvus esse, ante omnia opus est, ut teneat catholicam fidem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 375 | View Replies]

To: swordfishtrombone
Anything positive since the 90s in the region is because of OUR intervention one form or another... and here you are, lamenting the entire decision in the first place.
Enforcing the No Fly Zone cannot be rationally compared with the invasion of Iraq which, by the way, has ruined a great deal of the progress fostered by the No Fly Zone. The No Fly Zone did not cost 10 billion dollars a month nor the life of a single American soldier and very few Iraqi lives (innocent or otherwise) either.
423 posted on 11/07/2008 3:28:15 PM PST by Mr. Know It All (Quicumque vult salvus esse, ante omnia opus est, ut teneat catholicam fidem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 369 | View Replies]

To: Madame Dufarge; JNoelC
"arguing about how we got here isn't going to change the reality of today'."

"How we got here" is precisely how we understand the "reality of today."

Precisely. To put it another way; If we don't understand "How we got here" it isn't possible to avoid going there again in the future.

Since Congress is the biggest decider of where we are going and by design Congress works by arguing things "arguing about how we got here" had better take place.

424 posted on 11/07/2008 3:29:02 PM PST by TigersEye (Intellectuals only exist if you think they do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 390 | View Replies]

To: techcor; Enchante; jwalsh07; TigersEye
He probably believes 5 tons of uranium yellow cake was only kept around as a sandbox for the neighborhood kids.
This was kept under IAEA seal, which was checked in December in 2002 and found to have been undisturbed. And despite the fact that Iraq already had yellowcake Uranium, we are supposed to believe that Hussen tried to buy more from Niger. And so on and so on and yeah, I know Hannity says the WMD were moved to Syria. Blah blah blah.

I've given up arguing with 9/11 Truthers and you guys aren't any different. You and the other Iraq Truthers obviously have an emotional need to hang on to long-debunked propaganda. Have fun with that. I'm done.

425 posted on 11/07/2008 3:29:08 PM PST by Mr. Know It All (Quicumque vult salvus esse, ante omnia opus est, ut teneat catholicam fidem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 412 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Know It All

The guys who got shot at while patrolling that no fly zone would beg to differ with your opinion.


426 posted on 11/07/2008 3:30:23 PM PST by Darksheare (Admin Moderator: Something like a GRUE... on performance enhancing substances.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 423 | View Replies]

To: Delta 21
FIRE AT WILL ! ! !

But what did Will do?

427 posted on 11/07/2008 3:30:27 PM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (Faith Manages)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

In the big picture, I agree with you and the others who responded to my post. But I for one am sick and tired of all of the nastiness. If they’re feeling magnanamous in victory and want to play nice, I don’t see the harm in trying to work with them.

Please understand this is not me saying that I want to join them or that I think that their ideology is anything but ruinous, but if they want to forge partnerships, I fail to see the harm of having our points of view represented.

Trust, but verify.


428 posted on 11/07/2008 3:30:54 PM PST by ravensandricks (Jesus rides beside me. He never buys any smokes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 387 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Know It All

So where did it all go if it were truly undisturbed?


429 posted on 11/07/2008 3:31:00 PM PST by Darksheare (Admin Moderator: Something like a GRUE... on performance enhancing substances.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 425 | View Replies]

To: trubolotta

I didn’t post the quote you seem to be attributing to me. ???


430 posted on 11/07/2008 3:31:49 PM PST by TigersEye (Intellectuals only exist if you think they do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 406 | View Replies]

To: Traviswf

431 posted on 11/07/2008 3:33:07 PM PST by usconservative (REJECT OBAMUNISM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Know It All
Enforcing the No Fly Zone cannot be rationally compared with the invasion of Iraq which, by the way, has ruined a great deal of the progress fostered by the No Fly Zone. The No Fly Zone did not cost 10 billion dollars a month nor the life of a single American soldier and very few Iraqi lives (innocent or otherwise) either.

Of course. I always forget what a veritable utopia the nation of Iraq was before the evil Americans came in and shot civilians, raped women, snubbed out any notion of free press and tossed dissenters by the thousands into unmarked mass graves. Oh wait, is that right? Please enlighten us with your pentrating insight, oh Wise One... considering the media's coverage, I've forgotten if Iraq was ruled with an iron fist by a despotic thug who was linked time and time again with the suicide bombers in Israel and the original WTC bombing crew, among many other egregious injustices against freedom and liberty in general

No one is discounting the lives lost on both sides, specifically our men & women

"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time, with the blood of patriots and tyrants."

432 posted on 11/07/2008 3:39:55 PM PST by swordfishtrombone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 423 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Know It All

You have not responded to my post which called you out for a ridiculous mis-statement about “Curveball” so for you to compare me to the “9/11 Truthers” is especially despicable.

I asked you for substantiation on a post of yours that was patently false and you respond with vicious smears.

As for the “yellowcake” issues, you are showing once again that you think like the nutty leftists on KOS. Are you a troll?

The fact that the 500 tons of yellowcake uranium was under IAEA seal was a lot less significant than a lot of people seem to think. That only meant that IF Saddam continued to allow inspections then we could determine whether he had broken the seals to begin using that yellowcake in a renewed nuclear program. It did not mean he could not decide at any time to utilize all that yellowcake to make many weapons, only that we might know he had re-started his nuclear program IF the IAEA was able to inspect the seals (which was always a big “IF”).

So, it was always a big problem to allow all that yellowcake to remain in Iraq - the seals only meant that Saddam could not use it in secret, not that he could never use it.

Furthermore, the reason that Saddam’s regime might have wanted to obtain new uranium supplies in secret was that IF he wanted to re-start his nuclear program surreptitiously, then a new supply would be invaluable - he could buy time by allowing the IAEA to inspect the seals on the known supply, while running a secret program, and ignorant trolls like you would never be the wiser (nor would all the govts. that wanted to bury their heads in the sand).....

SO, can you grasp it now? It’s not an either/or..... the 500 tons of yellowcake known to be under seal in Iraq would have been invaluable to a re-started nuclear program at any time that Saddam was willing to openly flout the IAEA..... AND Saddam had strong reason to seek a new, secret supply so long as he cared to maintain the illusion that he did not have a nuclear weapons program.

You are far less informed than you imagine, and your insults only further reveal your ignorance.


433 posted on 11/07/2008 3:40:13 PM PST by Enchante (Sarah Palin is Worth Infinitely More to Us than Any Vicious RINO Anonymous Staffers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 425 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Know It All
I can only prseume that you don't have a clue about pre war Iraq and the terrorists that Hussein gave sanctuary to. Which is about par for the course for ignoramuses yelling about 9/11 truthers. The truth is that terrorist took down the towers and terorists were given sanctuary in Iraq. And those terrorist were responsible for the murder of your fellow citizens and our Israeli allies.

Ignorance is curable friend stupidity is forever. Your choice.

434 posted on 11/07/2008 3:40:42 PM PST by jwalsh07 (It's the Marxism Stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 425 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

My bad - that wasn’t intended for you - latent click syndrome? Sorry.


435 posted on 11/07/2008 3:40:56 PM PST by trubolotta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 430 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Know It All
I'm done.

That's for sure. Not one post with substance.

436 posted on 11/07/2008 3:41:20 PM PST by TigersEye (Intellectuals only exist if you think they do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 425 | View Replies]

To: trubolotta
FRiendly fire? LOL

Think nothing of it. It was merely a flesh wound.

437 posted on 11/07/2008 3:42:30 PM PST by TigersEye (Intellectuals only exist if you think they do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 435 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

LOL! I love the scene. Sorry for the misfire.


438 posted on 11/07/2008 3:44:41 PM PST by trubolotta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 437 | View Replies]

To: Traviswf
And Obama ran on uniting the country, on being bipartisan. That's sort of ALL he ran on.

If being bipartisan is important to you then you have made a big mistake voting for Obama. He has done nothing in his years in the senate (state, US) to indicated he has the willingness or ability to be bipartisan. Contrast that with McCain and his reputation of being bipartisan (much to the displeasure of posters here) on many occasions in his history.

439 posted on 11/07/2008 3:46:10 PM PST by TruthWillWin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

precisely so...Limbaugh is right, defeat liberals and then if we want to, sit them on the couch and figure out what makes them tick!


440 posted on 11/07/2008 4:00:24 PM PST by tpanther (All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 387 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 401-420421-440441-460 ... 641-658 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson