Skip to comments.
What are Palin's future chances for the White House, let's look at history (Not encouraging)
Black Thursday, 2008
| Perdogg
Posted on 11/06/2008 7:56:49 PM PST by Perdogg
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101 next last
1
posted on
11/06/2008 7:56:49 PM PST
by
Perdogg
To: Perdogg
Give it up. Vanity record today?
2
posted on
11/06/2008 7:57:37 PM PST
by
libbylu
To: Perdogg
Screw history, look at Barack Obama.
Now, can we forget about 2012 and focus on 2010, please???
Sarah Palin should go back to Alaska, act as she were (low key, effective) and build a record of accomplishment.
3
posted on
11/06/2008 7:58:19 PM PST
by
Boiling Pots
(Can we go back to hating John McCain now?)
To: Chet 99; DesertRhino; ExTexasRedhead; Frantzie; GOP_Lady; HamiltonJay; impeachedrapist; ...
4
posted on
11/06/2008 7:58:35 PM PST
by
Perdogg
(01-20-2013)
To: libbylu
5
posted on
11/06/2008 7:58:56 PM PST
by
antceecee
(McCain ~ Palin '08 May God have mercy on us and protect us from evil.)
To: Perdogg
Sarah is Sarah, the losers on your list, who were they. She has a real job with real responsibilities. Unlike Obama and slo Joe.
When she decides, she will let us know.
6
posted on
11/06/2008 8:00:18 PM PST
by
Tarpon
(America's first principles freedom, liberty and self-reliance will never fail.)
To: Perdogg
Doesn’t worry me a bit.
If the history isn’t there, Sarah will make history.
What we need to be rid of is Romney and his ilk. Everyone that ran for the nomination in 2008 should be off the table for 2012.
7
posted on
11/06/2008 8:01:14 PM PST
by
perfect_rovian_storm
(One good thing about 11/4: I no longer have to pretend that I like John McCain.)
To: libbylu
this is not a vanity, this “history” under chat.
8
posted on
11/06/2008 8:01:16 PM PST
by
Perdogg
(01-20-2013)
To: Boiling Pots
She has a record of accomplishment...the only one of the four who had actual executive experience.
And more experience in government that Barry the Marxist.
She will be the first woman president of the USA if she so chooses.
9
posted on
11/06/2008 8:01:55 PM PST
by
svcw
(Great selection of gift baskets: http://baskettastic.com/)
To: Perdogg
If Sarah Palin were to run when she reaches Hillary's age the year would be 2024.
She's only 44 years old.
She has many years ahead of her in the running if she chooses.
10
posted on
11/06/2008 8:02:29 PM PST
by
hercuroc
To: Perdogg
Well Palin lose a Lt. Gov race (which is kinda like a state VP) and then she won governor.
To: perfect_rovian_storm
Everyone that ran for the nomination in 2008 should be off the table for 2012.Concur 100%!
12
posted on
11/06/2008 8:03:56 PM PST
by
PhiKapMom
( BOOMER SOONER LetsGetThisRight.com)
To: Tarpon; perfect_rovian_storm
I agree. But History is History for a reason. I like Sarah, I was one of her earliest backers and will continue to be.
13
posted on
11/06/2008 8:04:01 PM PST
by
Perdogg
(01-20-2013)
To: Perdogg
On September 12, 2001 if someone told you that before the decade was out the American people would elect a President with a name like Barrack Hussein Obama, who had a Muslim father and was educated in a madras and raised in the Islamic tradition for a period of time, you would have said “no way!”
History and precedent seems to mean little now days.
14
posted on
11/06/2008 8:04:45 PM PST
by
ejonesie22
(Stupidity has an expiration date 11-4-2012)
To: Perdogg
What were Palin’s changes of being a Female Vice Presidential candidate? Let’s see, would that be 2 in how many? There were 72 almost Vice Presidents and 46 Vice Presidents - so 2 in 118 odds??? Yet, she did it. Message in that.
15
posted on
11/06/2008 8:04:48 PM PST
by
Blogger
To: svcw
Right, but it’s too early for 12.
2010 is first.
16
posted on
11/06/2008 8:04:55 PM PST
by
Boiling Pots
(Can we go back to hating John McCain now?)
To: Perdogg; All
STOP WITH THE PALIN CRAP ALREADY!!!! Is there some kind of freeper stalking Sarah Palin obsession going on here. Do we have a play misty for me going or what.
CHILL PILL TIME Y'ALL
17
posted on
11/06/2008 8:04:56 PM PST
by
Fred
(The Democrat Party is the Nadir of Nihilism and Obummer is a WHINING marxist)
To: Perdogg
This is kind of meaningless because most (all?) VP picks are obscure and are of little consequence to the campaign.
Presidential candidates are loath to pick a running-mate who might overshadow them. This is certainly the case with Obama picking Biden.
18
posted on
11/06/2008 8:06:26 PM PST
by
Chet 99
To: ejonesie22
I wake up and ask myself if this is a bad dream.
19
posted on
11/06/2008 8:06:29 PM PST
by
Perdogg
(01-20-2013)
To: Perdogg
She’s different though. However, I don’t want to anoint her. I think we’ll have a better idea of what she wants to do after she does CPAC, which I’m sure she’ll do next year.
We’ve got a number of good people to choose from, which is good. Beats the hell out of last time...lol
I wouldn’t shut her out because she doesn’t match a historical pattern though. Rules were made to be broken. :)
20
posted on
11/06/2008 8:07:39 PM PST
by
perfect_rovian_storm
(One good thing about 11/4: I no longer have to pretend that I like John McCain.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson