Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: nutmeg; PhiKapMom; Norman Bates; fieldmarshaldj

There will be a lot of pressure for Jindal to run for the U.S. Senate in 2010, when David Vitter will undoubtedly be retiring.


24 posted on 11/05/2008 9:07:39 PM PST by Clintonfatigued (If Islam conquers the world, the Earth will be at peace because the human race will be killed off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Clintonfatigued

No, we need him as governor. Vitter should run again.


36 posted on 11/05/2008 9:15:47 PM PST by Norman Bates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: Clintonfatigued; Clemenza; Impy; AuH2ORepublican; Norman Bates

Jindal can’t (nor should) run for the Senate in 2010. Mitch Landrieu would become Governor and would likely preside over redistricting (and, yes, he probably would be outright elected Governor in 2011). Vitter did something dumb, but by 2010, it will largely be forgotten. If he does decide to step down, one of the 5 Congressmembers could take a run (Alexander, Boustany, Scalise, Cassidy or the 4th district winner next month).


63 posted on 11/06/2008 9:47:32 AM PST by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: Clintonfatigued; fieldmarshaldj

I was wondering about Vitter.

My thoughts were that nobody would care about the adventures of his allegedly small endowment by 2010.


66 posted on 11/06/2008 10:39:09 AM PST by Impy (When he takes the oath of office with they say his middle name?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson