[trumandogz]

Churchill did not teach a science.

So yes, the choice should be yours. Have the schools teach science as it is accepted by 99% of the scientific community or have the schools teach Creationism as it is exhibited at the Creation Museum and on the Flintstones.

[MrB]

as it is accepted by 99% of the scientific community

I notice that you give no say to the PARENTS.

[tpanther]

Churchhill taught political science, it’s not WHAT he taught was the point, it’s the fact that godless liberals are incapable of objectivity was the point. (OF course it helps not te BE one to be able to see this!)

And it’s not 99% of scientists, nowhere even close in fact.

[metmom]

Have the schools teach science as it is accepted by 99% of the scientific community or have the schools teach Creationism as it is exhibited at the Creation Museum and on the Flintstones.

Just whose tax money is it that's paying to have whose children educated in the PUBLIC schools?

If 99% of the scientific community wants to pay for those schools, then I don't see why they shouldn't have a say in what's being taught.

Otherwise, it's the parents kids and parents extorted tax money. Parents have, time and again, expressed the wish to have creation addressed in schools only to be smacked down by litigation by the self-appointed elite who think that because they think that they know better than everyone else they have the right to dictate to everyone else what they should know and what they should be forced to live with.