Amusing example, but as an exercise in logic turns on the issue of how the author decided that the homeless person was more “deserving’.
Don't you get it? He gave the homeless guy - the dude without a JOB - the money that the waiter earned. The waiter got a taste of his own medicine. ‘Spreading the wealth round.’
Perhaps the waiter learned, perhaps not. Some liberals are toooooooooooooooooooooo stupid to ever understand a good example.
OK?
Have a great day!