[Reposting your questions here; they make me curious too.]
[quote]
[I] am not a techie... i don’t understand adobe, or layers,
so i make no claims there, either way.
but, i do have several things i am honestly curious about.
the photocopy curve mentioned above, is legitimate and expected. but, why do some words seem to curve less than others?
http://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=186343
how can signatures be in different resolutions on the same document, unless one of them was pasted on? ml/nj has it here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2720608/posts?page=23#23
and boxes that are identical down to the pixel? :
http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/05/irrefutable-proof-obamas-new-birth.html
why do other documents show the security paper background as they are supposed to, but this one LFBC doesn’t?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2722377/posts?page=259#259
why does Hawaii list a birth for Virginia Sunahara in their index, and then claim they have no record of her?
http://butterdezillion.wordpress.com/2011/05/19/hdoh-funny-business-regarding-virginia-sunahara/
[unquote]
Corsi’s Book, “Where’s the Birth Certificate”, Taking off Despite Obama’s Preemption
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=300845
“The publicity, intended to be negative, had the reverse effect at Amazon. The book rocketed into the evening last night and today was at No. 12 overall, and No. 1 in categories for books on constitutional law, government and professional and technical... Media, including the Associated Press, typically call the book’s claims “unsubstantiated” or “debunked,” usually without evidence.” [Goes on to dissect leftist assaults on the book that hurt Kerry: “Unfit for Command”.]
[further down]
Since the document’s late-April release, a flood of expert analyses, some by Obama voters, has cast serious doubt on the legitimacy of the president’s belatedly produced “birth certificate.”
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=296881
Among topics dealt with in “Where’s the Birth Certificate?”:
• The mainstream media feverishly investigated the presidential eligibility story – that is, when it focused on Obama’s Republican opponent, John McCain.
• Obama was born a dual citizen of the United Kingdom and the United States, a circumstance the Constitution’s framers considered an iron-clad roadblock to the presidency. The book documents the clear, original intent of the Constitution’s founders, which was that no one with dual loyalties would ever be president and commander in chief.
• As a boy, Obama was officially registered in school as a Muslim and Indonesian citizen, another barrier to U.S. natural-born citizenship.
• The press and blogosphere widely reported Obama was born at Queen’s Medical Center in Honolulu – before deciding he was born across town at Kapi’olani Women’s and Children’s Hospital. To this day, Kapi’olani is bizarrely secretive about Obama’s alleged birth there.
• The Congressional Research Service, a public policy arm of Congress, officially admits no one in the government ever vetted Obama’s constitutional eligibility.
• In preparation for the 2012 election, more than a dozen states are considering legislation to force all presidential candidates to prove they are constitutionally qualified before they can be placed on that state’s ballot
• Going far beyond the issue of birth certificates, Corsi not only documents inconsistencies, blackouts and outright fabrications in Obama’s life narrative that have generated widespread doubts, but lays out a compelling body of evidence that Obama is not a natural-born citizen as is required of all presidents by Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution.
One of the biggest disputes that remains unaddressed is why Barack Obama, who lived in Hawaii as a teen, has a Social Security number that indicates he had a Connecticut address.
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=287253
The controversy over Obama’s Social Security number traces back to a WND story May 11, 2010, when it was reported that two private investigators working independently were asking why Obama was using a number set aside for applicants in Connecticut while there is no record he ever had a mailing address in the state.
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=287253
The records indicate the number was issued between 1977 and 1979, when Obama was between 16 and 18 years old and living in Hawaii.
The Social Security website confirms that the first three digits in Obama’s Social Security number are reserved for applicants with Connecticut addresses, 040-049.
Since 1973, Social Security numbers have been issued by one central office, and the first three digits of a person’s Social Security number have been determined by the Zip code of the mailing address on the application.