Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Top Gun vs. UFO (encounter revealed in files declassified today; pilot confirms)
The Sun (U.K.) ^ | October 20, 2008 | John Coles

Posted on 10/20/2008 3:44:51 AM PDT by Stoat

Exclusive

 

Top Gun vs. UFO

 
Locked on ... Sabre jet had UFO in sights

Locked on ... Sabre jet had UFO in sights

 

 
 
 

A FORMER Top Gun told yesterday how he was ordered to shoot down a massive UFO — over NORWICH.

RAF controllers told US pilot Milton Torres to “lock on” and launch all 24 of his rockets over the city.

 

Tale ... Milton Torres as a young man, and today

Tale ... Milton Torres as a young man, and today

 

But as he came within seconds of firing at the alien intruder — “the size of an aircraft carrier” on his radar — it vanished at 10,000mph.

The amazing close encounter is revealed in secret Ministry of Defence X-Files which are declassified today.

Milton said: “It was some kind of alien snooping over England. I guess we’ll never know what it was.”

The incident happened in 1957 when Milton was a 26-year-old US Air Force lieutenant based at RAF Manston in Kent.

At 11pm one night he was ordered to scramble in his F-86D Sabre fighter to attack a “bogey” hovering above Norfolk.

Speaking about it publicly for the first time, he said: “I was told I would be firing a complete salvo, all 24 rockets. I was pumped up — this was the sort of thing that happened before a war.”

 

He got the UFO on his radar and closed for the attack at the Sabre’s top speed of almost 700mph — then it disappeared off his screen in a flash.

 

Milton, now 77, said: “I was smoking, as fast as I could go. This thing had a different propulsion system. It was not an airplane.”

 

The flyer said he was visited afterwards by a sinister security official and warned not to tell anyone — so he kept silent until now.

 

The close encounter is in 19 files made available online yesterday by the National Archives.

 

j.coles@the-sun.co.uk



TOPICS: UFO's
KEYWORDS: closeencounter; topgun; ufo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-192 next last
To: Blueflag
(Sabres could not carry 24 air-to-air anything except gun rounds

Wrong. He was flying the F-86D version. It had no guns, only a belly pack with 24 folding-fin air to air unguided rockets.

21 posted on 10/20/2008 4:55:47 AM PDT by cayuga (A 9mm is a .45 set to Stun. NRA-Life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: eastforker

The tin foil in me would say “why release the archive info now”, at the cusp of a financial system realignment and a possible socialist change in the US?

Are they getting ready for a revelation?


22 posted on 10/20/2008 4:56:27 AM PDT by mdmathis6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: higgmeister

The Borg sphere as it crashed through ripples of chronitron
distortion on its way to its resting place in the Arctic....


23 posted on 10/20/2008 4:59:44 AM PDT by mdmathis6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

Interesting but several years before this incident my father a fighter pilot serving in Korea had an encounter with “UFO” over Korea, unknown type craft, same incredible speed (nothing known in technology at the time) when it disappeared....

he was smart enough to never tell anyone about his encounter except my mother.


24 posted on 10/20/2008 5:01:16 AM PDT by silverleaf (Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

Ummm. Can someone confirm that an F-86 can actually carry 24 rockets much less “lock-on” and fire all of the simultaneously?


25 posted on 10/20/2008 5:02:59 AM PDT by 84rules ( Ooh-Rah! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blueflag

They might have been testing new radar configuration and camouflage and didn’t need a whole squadron of sabres up there just a control jet with weapons radar on (with a pilot with attitude) at the stick!


26 posted on 10/20/2008 5:03:21 AM PDT by mdmathis6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

Sabres had radar and guided missiles? Who knew?


27 posted on 10/20/2008 5:06:53 AM PDT by GOP_Party_Animal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdmathis6

The files were actually released several months ago. Now they are online.


28 posted on 10/20/2008 5:09:59 AM PDT by arthurus (Old age and guile beats youth and enthusiasm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Blueflag
Actually, it was an American jet with an American fighter pilot.

Scramble launch with a single interceptor for a single target sounds very reasonable. And, by the way, American controllers were serving alongside the Brit controllers back then (even today we have exchange officers). If the situation appeared threatening at time of launch then I am sure more jets would have been launched at this stationary target.

29 posted on 10/20/2008 5:10:32 AM PDT by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: cayuga

I hate being wrong... but you are right.

I was thinking strictly about the Korea config’d models.

The F-86D was indeed an anti-Soviet bomber interceptor.

Fascinating. Using unguided rockets to kill bombers at 500yds with a computer-aided deflection shot.

http://home.att.net/~jbaugher1/p86_6.html


30 posted on 10/20/2008 5:13:32 AM PDT by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Stoat; Lonesome
Yes, the canopy was open for takeoff.

My understanding was the cockpit canopy was open in case of ejection at slow speed and low altitude.

Egress systems back then were not quick and if you attempted ejection at takeoff speeds, the canopy may not cleanly separate and/or may not separate fast enough, to prevent the pilot from going through the glass and possibly losing his kneecaps. That is what I seem to recall in Life Support school a few years back.

31 posted on 10/20/2008 5:14:45 AM PDT by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Party_Animal

see the link in post 30. I got edumucated as well. I never knew of these birds.


32 posted on 10/20/2008 5:16:33 AM PDT by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf
>>he was smart enough to never tell anyone about his encounter except my mother.<<

I never could understand this alleged fear about admitting to seeing something strange or odd. Heck, we are all fascinated by it.

A few years back when flying in an OH-58, the pilot and I saw “something.” We couldn't actually figure out what it was but we wasted no time in telling everyone about it when we landed. (Incident written up in Paul H. Smith's book, “Reading the Enemy's Mind.”)

Many of my fighter pilot peers have seen some strange things and we all talk about it in the bar. Not one holds back for fear of. . . what. . .I dunno. . .

33 posted on 10/20/2008 5:21:36 AM PDT by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Hulka
Yes, the canopy was open for takeoff.

He landing ... notice the speed brakes and leading edge slots deployed

34 posted on 10/20/2008 5:23:15 AM PDT by Robe (Rome did not create a great empire by talking, they did it by killing all those who opposed them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Hulka
Yes, the canopy was open for takeoff.

He landing ... notice the speed brakes and leading edge slots deployed

35 posted on 10/20/2008 5:23:51 AM PDT by Robe (Rome did not create a great empire by talking, they did it by killing all those who opposed them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Joiseydude

Fine, I’m not gonna buy the little green men angle. I mean, really, not saying there isn’t intelligent life out there, but does everything flying we can’t easily explain have to bring the following knee-jerk reaction?

unexplained phenomenon- AHA, must be UFOs manned by Aliens!

I gotta say, if they’d been visiting us for 50 years or so...one would think they’d have left some more evidence then they supposedly have by now. I mean, when the Soviets were landing recon teams along the Alaskan and Swedish coastlines during the Cold War, even they left little signs they were there occasionally.


36 posted on 10/20/2008 5:27:34 AM PDT by Braak (The US Military, the real arms inspectors!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Blueflag
Despite the official nature of this ‘report’ it has BS all over it.

Agree
37 posted on 10/20/2008 5:28:37 AM PDT by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Robe
Yes, you are right. . .open for takeoff AND landing (low and slow speeds affected the operation of the egress system). I was a bit quick on the clicker, not paying too close attention, and erred in not saying “canopy open for takeoff and landing.” Appreciate you keeping me honest.
38 posted on 10/20/2008 5:29:02 AM PDT by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Grut; Lonesome
He's landing. YOu can see the speed brakes behind the wing are open.

Cockpit open on landing is a carry over from WW2 days. Pilots would open the canopy to get a better look at the ground or carrier deck as the landed. It was discontinued as command and controls got better and planes got faster on landings.

39 posted on 10/20/2008 5:31:21 AM PDT by Pistolshot (Palin has run a state, city, and a business. NObama has only run his mouth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Blueflag

The F-86D had no guns.

Its armament consisted of 24 70-millimeter (2.75-inch) unguided “folding-fin air rockets (FFAR)”, stored in a belly tray that could be lowered in half a second. The rockets could be fired in salvos of 6, 12, or 24 at intruding bomber formations.

Each rocket had a range of over 4 kilometers (2.5 miles) and a warhead weighing 3.4 kilograms (7.5 pounds).


40 posted on 10/20/2008 5:31:22 AM PDT by airdalechief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-192 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson