Amazing that these atheists rely so much on their [faulty] intellect which, by their own “logic”, “evolved” through random processes “guided” by the environment.
Of COURSE if you make an assumption, then examine all evidence within the confines of that assumption, you can prove the assumption.
For sure MrB! If you're conducting an experiment to test an assumption, then the first thing you have to do is qualify your evidence, as relating or not relating to the problem at hand. It must be fairly easy to "prove" stuff on that basis. :^)
Why is this such a difficult concept for our evo friends to grasp?