Posted on 10/16/2008 12:21:07 PM PDT by Daus
The reply was it was going to come in the form of a $500 credit out of FICA. They plan to make it up on the top end by removing the caps.
Thing no one is discussing is this will lead to job losses as employers pay 50% of the FICA. This is a huge chunk they pay out each year. IF the cap is removed and they have to pay even more they will make it up by job cuts or going offshore. Then there is the 1099 employees who pay the entire FICA hit... they would see a large chunk go to FICA... all so Obama can use the fund as his personal candy jar to please the poor with tax credits...
This man is no economic genius and more people advising him, like Warren Buffet, think like Joe Biden, it is patriotic to pay higher taxes -- as long as they have all "their" tax loopholes in place....
Never fear.... these businesses will just move offshore like Halliburton.
Joe would pay $750 more a year in taxes under Obama’s plan.
The first 250k is taxed at 36% the remaining 25k is taxed at 39%.
Joe has most of of the value of the business ends up being "goodwill"
When you incorporate, it's kind of like gifting some of your assets to the corp. It generally owns the lion's share of itself, so you, as the managers have to look out for its interests, not just the interest of the shareholders holding the stock that's been issued (you).
Take extra care when you take bonuses, because the IRS might redefine them to be dividends, taxable to both the corp & you.
By keeping most of the assets in a separate entity, you gain back much of the flexibility you lose with incorporation. Make sure you have all of your lease agreements in your corporate books. If all leases have a one year term, you can reevaluate the rate that the corporation pays every year. The corporation must get a reasonable deal, so you can't drain corporate assets above a fair market rate in your leases. Anything shorter than a year may raise red flags.
Understand, you have to find a balance, because your corp will have more difficulty getting credit if it owns no assets. If you have a good relationship & history with your bank, it shouldn't be a problem, because you'll do most of your borrowing with the sole-prop or partnership. As the owner of the sole-prop or partnership, be careful using the sole-prop's or partnership's assets as collateral for corporate borrowing, because that would pierce the corporate veil.
Also, be careful about lending your corporation anything, because that also pierces the corporate veil & it may be looked upon as "goodwill", like the assets you gave the corporation when you incorporated. Getting the money back will be seen as a taxable event for you.
The employee pays 100% of FICA. The rate employers pay their employees take all government burdens into account. Wage + tax liability + cost of bennies (paid vacations, health insurance, unemployment liability, work comp insurance) = cost of employing someone. Wage rates are adjusted accordingly.
WE are broke as a company each year at the close of our tax year. We pay all money out to the owners. Then we start over. But we have a different kind of business and can do this. We may have 2 owners that are in the 33% bracket. No need to leave that money sitting there and lose 33% for those of us who are well below that leve. The dang tax system in this country is nothing but a scam for politicians to buy votes group by group or class by class. It makes me ill.
Yes I know about all the not-so-hidden additional costs of having employee, but unless that employee is a independent contractor the employer pays 1/2 the FICA... the employee pays one half and the employer pays the second half and the full amount is added to the employees year end W-2.
The FICA base for 2008 is $102,000. The employer and employee each pay their share of the FICA tax of 6.2% or a maximum of $6,324 from the employee and $6,324 from the employer.... and if self-employed you pay the full 12.4%.
<
If you're self employed, the spouse or minor child of the business owner are exempt from it, least that's how it used to be. Same with Federal unemployment, the tax paid with the 940.
Exactly.... and now the democrats want to hit employees with a mandatory additional 5% administered by SS Administration and basically do away with employer-matching 401k’s... I don’t know why every GOP candidate including McCain is not running with this... so much for Obama saying he won’t increase middle income taxes, they are already working on it and he isn’t even elected.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.