Posted on 10/15/2008 10:34:12 AM PDT by Niuhuru
A lot of freepers pretty much compare Obama with Hitler the same way the Libs think Bush is like Hitler.
It just popped into my head and I wanted to get it down before I forget.
When Hitler was a young kid, he supposedly had a Jewish relative, supposedly his father who was a Jewish businessman who his mother had an affair with while she worked as a maid.
Hitler shrouded it while he was running for Furher and after he gained power he trivilized it or simply ignored it, due to his self loathing.
Barack is the same way. Ever since he began his campaign he has trivialized his mother's side of his family and emphasizeed his blackness. He has surrounded himself, like Hitler's anti-semetic thugs, with blacks who hate whites with visceral loathing that will without a doubt turn genocidal if Obama is elected.
Like Obama, Hitler wasn't initially intimidating and seemed to be strong and a refreshing, young and vigorous change. People were crazy about him and he was a war veteran and decorated, he didn't seem thuggish or a bully (to my knowledge). By himself he would have been a charismatic, if entirely anti-climactic leader.
However, it was his self loathing of his Jewish lineage, and a lack of being a part of society. He was alienated and during the chaos of the post-WWI years found others like him, disillusioned with the mainstream and the government. Mainstream government and society seemed incapable of dealing with the problems and needed strong decisive leadership which was lacking.
Hitler then jumped into the fray, built a strong base of supporters who thought exactly like him and didn't just talk and exchange ideas, they turned themselves into a unit of thugs and former army members and sought out the finest and most ruthless minds.
After the failed pustch he was in jail and wrote his memoirs which didn't so much describe his life so much as his ideas of a perfect society and racial purity. Obama is remarkably similar with his memoirs and how he shies away from describing in detail his background and instead concentrates on his doctrine and ideas of how society should be run based on principles not so much based on racial purity, but on how a 'just' and 'fair' country could be built. That blacks such as himself and his circle would run everything pretty much goes unmentioned as something that should be taken for granted.
Like Hitler in regards to his Jewishness, Obama has a strong streak of self loathing towards his white lineage and an unexpressed determination to prove himeslf as unstintingly black. To prove it, he has surrounded himself with the worst of black militants and other outcasts, racial and social. He has his strong arm group the black panthers, members of the media, and also a tight knit group of hard core loyalists who will do anything to take back what didn't belong to them in the first place.
Unlike the religious doctrine that spurred the Nazis on, it'll be about the racial doctrine that has been poisoning blacks since the sixties and seventies. Not about killing Christ, but about slavery. Slavery is the "killed Christ" of the modern age with whites in the role of "Evil Jews."
Of course in the end, the Jews are always on the list. I hoep they remember that.
Comparisons to Hitler should be reserved only to genocidal madmen.
Come on, Obama is not like Hitler at all, except that both:
1. Claim that you’ll make them proud of their nation again.
2. Blame everything on the present government.
3. Develop a logo to be used everywhere.
4. Involve the children, make it a family event
5. Convince them that the government, under your guidance, is the cure
6. Make your followers believe.....believe...that they understand
something that others do not. We are special!
7. Ridicule the opposition - they deserve no respect (important)
8. Get power in any way possible, if you win you then hold the reigns on the
enforcement authority, you will not punish yourself.
9. Use a financial problem that affects as many people as possible. Blame it on the opponents.
10. Be ready to use force to fight your opponents.
Reductio ad Hitlerum
Like the Iranian nutjob? Mugabe? Your Black Muslim Bakery?
I totally disagree. Hitler's rise to power was not only notable, but deserving of study and caution when the same elements are recognized in todays world.
If we wait until someone else finally becomes a genocidal madman, we won't be around to make the comparison.
How do you know Obama isn’t genocidal? What about the people around him?
Let’s not forget that Obama’s mother pretty much dumped him for her “new” family and he wanted to leave her to live with his grandparents. He also wasn’t there when she was dying. I missed my mother’s death by 10 minutes, but I certainly wasn’t in another state!
It seems Freud would have a field day with this.
http://www.slate.com/id/2171745/
Brutality by the Bay
Why did the Oakland police do so little about Your Black Muslim Bakery’s thuggery?
By Christopher Hitchens
Posted Monday, Aug. 6, 2007, at 1:01 PM ET
Hmmmm....
You are speaking from hindsight.
When Hitler was elected, he was not a genocidal madman. He was a “Savior of Germany” that ran on a campaign of “Change”.
There are NINETEEN letters in Barrack Hussein Obama!!!
With the exception of the “use of force”, you’ve listed a bunch of random campaign tactics that are hardly unique to Hitlerian politics. Every political campaign in this country, from both parties, involves almost EVERY one of those items — create a recognizable logo, blame the opposition for everything, create national pride, ridicule, seize on financial difficuties, cart out families and children, etc.
Again — Reductio ad Hitlerum.
H
I sure HOPE this guy is different than Hitler.
Which candidate of either party have created new presidential seals for their campaign materials?
The real issue here is Hitler was the head of the National Socialist Movement in Germany.
Obama is the head of the International Socialist movement here in America.
Both are ultra-left wing socialists.
And Obama is using the some of the SAME tactics that were used in the past.
>> When Hitler was elected, he was not a genocidal madman. He was a “Savior of Germany” that ran on a campaign of “Change”.
So was Ronald Reagan (substitute the US for Germany).
Generally speaking, only the truly desperate must raise Hitler in a political campaign — and only in the rarest of occasions is it a viable comparison ... this is not one of them.
Barack Obama is wrong, and would be a terrible President in the ridiculous model of Jimmy Carter ... but Adolf Hitler he is not. Making such ridiculous comparisons only forces reasonable conservatives, like myself, to come to the defense of a political enemy.
H
Mussolini is the more appropriate historical analog.
Wrong. Hitler had Ernst Rohm’s stormtroopers in the streets intimidating and cracking heads during the two elections. He wrote Mein Kampf years before taking power in Germany. He was indeed a genocidal madman from the outset.
>> Which candidate of either party have created new presidential seals for their campaign materials?
Every candidate creates logos — few resemble Presidential seals. But, while arrogant and classless, this hardly makes Obama analogous to Adolf Hitler.
H
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.