[Swordmaker]

from the sidebar:

---

IS IT REAL?

Scientifically, we don't know the age of the Shroud of Turin. However, we do know it is at least twice as old as the now discredited carbon 14 date. As for the images, we have no idea how they are formed. But they were not made by any known artistic method.

The Atheist, the skeptic, the rationalist must accept the scientific facts just as any Christian should. To deny that the shroud is authentic requires a leap of faith. So does affirmation. But the evidence suggests that it is a late-Second Temple era burial shroud of a crucifixion victim. From that, much can be inferred.

[Swordmaker]

When Atheists act like Fundamentalists... in relation to the Shroud of Turin. PING!

I suspect this blog is run by Shroudie... but I don't know for sure.

If you want on or off the Shroud of Turin Ping List, Freepmail me.

[Salman]

Why would being resurrected make an image on the shroud anyway?

[pyrless]

Thanx for the ping. Keep an eye out for more for us.

[Goonch]

[Goonch]

Das Sudarium von Oviedo, Spanien. Die sensationelle Reliquie stimmt laut Untersuchungen von 1989 exakt mit dem legendären Grabtuch von Turin überein. Selbst das Blut auf dem Sudarium, die seltene Gruppe AB, entspricht dem Grabtuch von Turin. Zufall?