14. See id. at 80726 (discussing the facts of the case).
15. Id. at 811 (citation omitted).
16. United States v. Rahman, 1994 WL 388927 (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 22, 1994). See id. at *1 *4 for a discussion of the facts of the case that follow.
17. Id. at *2*4.
18. Id. at *1*2.
19. The late William Kunstler, who represented one of Sheik Rahmans codefendants, argued that Judge Mukasey should be recused from the Sheik Rahman case because he was Jewish and therefore a Zionist and thus was unable to be objective. United States v. El-Gabrowny, 844 F. Supp. 955, 957 (S.D.N.Y. 1994).
Thank you bump.