This was posted as a history article from 2002. I tried to title it so no one would be confused.
I found it interesting that after that head-on crash they proposed the same solutions that they are still talking about now, 6 years and 25 fatalities later.
Wait. So this is an article about ANOTHER train wreck in 2002? I think you should have said (in your title —(article NOT the current Metrolink wreck) and then in your post—It is the findings for a previous wreck in 2002. Glad you found this though and posted it. I was surprised when I thought this was the present wreck that the freight engineer was at fault as all news was orienting toward the Metrolink engineer. So it is still likely the Metrolink engineer?