Wait. So this is an article about ANOTHER train wreck in 2002? I think you should have said (in your title —(article NOT the current Metrolink wreck) and then in your post—It is the findings for a previous wreck in 2002. Glad you found this though and posted it. I was surprised when I thought this was the present wreck that the freight engineer was at fault as all news was orienting toward the Metrolink engineer. So it is still likely the Metrolink engineer?