[allmendream]

Need? There was never any “need” for fraud. If Piltdown man was NOT fraudulent it would be a problem for Evolution as nothing else suggests or suggested that human evolution took place in England. So no, there was never any “need” for fraud. Piltdown was promptly ignored by Science even before it was known to be a fraud because it didn't fit with everything else we were finding out.

Why do you feel the need to fraudulently represent the completeness of these fossil finds? Why do you feel the need to fraudulently represent the significance of “Piltdown” and “Nebraska”?

Oh, so then you can fraudulently represent ANY fossil find as “one tooth” or “fraud”.

Why do YOU feel the need for fraud?

[MrB]

Sorry, you’re the one “fraudulently representing” my posts as saying any fossil find as “one tooth” or “fraud”.

I simply asked if they did it AGAIN in this case. That’s it.

Must be an oversensitive bit on your part, knowing that evos NEED, yes NEED, fraud to support their case.