Rep. Buckley, wildlife groups urge nonlethal cougar plan (OR)

Mail Tribune ^ | September 10, 2008 | Mark Freeman

[jazusamo]

Joint legislative panel meets Friday in Newport to hear their views

State Rep. Peter Buckley and a cache of wildlife advocates on Friday will begin their bid to convince the Oregon Legislature to suspend the state's plan for managing cougars while searching for less lethal ways of reducing cougar-human conflicts.

A joint Oregon Legislature committee will hear Buckley and others during a meeting in Newport on the two-year-old Cougar Management Plan, reviled by some wildlife activists for its study to see whether killing cougars reduces complaints.

Activists say this amounts to indiscriminate cougar-killing that flies against public will and a 2006 Washington State University study suggesting cougar populations are not expanding as Oregon's plan concludes.

That study also concludes that backing off hunting — not increasing it — is the best remedy for curbing cougar-human conflicts.

"I want to ask (the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife) to stop until we are absolutely sure that what we're doing makes the most scientific sense and is not backfiring and causing more incidents between cougars and people in this state," Buckley, D-Ashland, said Monday.

"We need to stop, take a look at what we're doing and perhaps choose a different way to minimize conflicts and protect livestock," he said.

The hearing is of the Senate Environment and Natural Resources and House Agriculture and Natural Resources committees, and will be chaired by state Sen. Alan Bates, D-Ashland.

The hearing makes good on a promise last session by former state Sen. Brad Avakian, a Beaverton Democrat who ceded his chairmanship of the Senate Environment and Natural Resources Committee to Bates.

Bates also promised to hold a hearing during a May forum assailing the cougar plan in Ashland.

Buckley said he plans to offer a bill calling for a new round of peer review on the plan when the Legislature convenes in 2009. Ron Anglin, the ODFW's Wildlife Division administrator, said his agency went through two rounds of scientific review on pieces of the plan and he has no plans to do a third.

A computer model built within the plan estimates more than 5,000 cougars are in Oregon, and the plan outlines how the animals will be managed.

A key element is the killing of cougars in specific "target areas" to determine whether reducing cougar numbers also will reduce human-safety complaints as well as livestock damage.

A nearly 1,000-square-mile area of the Rogue Valley is one of the three target areas in the study, which began last February. In two years, 11 cougars have been killed for that part of the study, which calls for killing up to 24 cougars a year.

Anglin and supporters of the cougar plan were invited to attend the hearing and make presentations.

Also invited was Robert Wielgus, whose Large Carnivore Conservation Laboratory at WSU studied its cougar population. The study concludes that cougar populations in the Northwest actually are declining due in part to increased human intrusion on cougar habitat and a very young age structure of the cougar population caused by heavy hunting.

That study recommends reduced hunting levels, particularly among adult females, throughout the Pacific Northwest.

Anglin said ODFW biologists were aware of the Washington study data while crafting Oregon's plan and that there isn't universal agreement with its conclusions.

"It's good research and like any research, you have to be careful of how it's used and how you extrapolate it," Anglin said.

[jazusamo]

"I want to ask (the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife) to stop until we are absolutely sure that what we're doing makes the most scientific sense and is not backfiring and causing more incidents between cougars and people in this state," Buckley, D-Ashland, said Monday.

Another case of animal rights activists and liberal politicians trying to take away the authority of wildlife management officials under the guise of more expensive studies by moonbat activists at our universities.

[jazusamo]

That study also concludes that backing off hunting — not increasing it — is the best remedy for curbing cougar-human conflicts.

As human population increases and we encroach on more wildlife habitat how in the world do these people believe that by increasing cougar numbers it will remedy cougar-human encounters?

[realdifferent1]

Someone on this forum summed it up quite nicely:

Shoot-
Shovel-
Shut up.

Should be added to the FR Lexicon page.

[RexBeach]

Why don’t they have Mr. Obama come out and talk to the cougars? Perhaps they could work out something?

Obama: He’s the cougar candidate.

[george76]

PETA returns.

[jazusamo]

Anglin said ODFW biologists were aware of the Washington study data while crafting Oregon's plan and that there isn't universal agreement with its conclusions.

I believe Anglin is being kind to Robert Wielgus' study due to there being little agreement on it.

[Flycatcher]

That study also concludes that backing off hunting — not increasing it — is the best remedy for curbing cougar-human conflicts.

I believe the word for that is "counterintuitive."

[jazusamo]

Exactly...While the Wielgus study did conclude the best way to manage cougars is with the use of hounds, he at the same time tries to say that boot hunting by trophy hunters are killing adult male cougars thereby causing younger ones to have more conflict with humans. That sounds flawed to me but I’m no expert.

I don’t believe it’s possible for trophy hunters to kill many adult cougars without the use of hounds and their use is outlawed in OR and WA.

Also, if more adult male cougars are killed it leaves open territory for the younger males to take over instead of being forced into areas that are more populated by humans.