Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Bitwhacker

It would be nice if they were in play. The USGS report from April 2008 seems to contradict the 1999 estimate you refer to.


473 posted on 09/12/2008 1:52:32 PM PDT by Crystal Cove
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 471 | View Replies ]


To: Crystal Cove; tillacum; Molly Pitcher

OK, so I guess we don’t try at all. There is *no* oil around the continental and even extra-continental US that we can conceivably go after, even though we haven’t looked for it for 30 years in some places...I am not buying that porposition. I think there are waaay more than 3-4 billion barrels in Bakken, and even the Chinese realize that there is oil in the Caribbean, yet we choose not to pursue it, regardless of how ‘pretty the rigs are at night’...;-))


474 posted on 09/12/2008 1:59:38 PM PDT by Bitwhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 473 | View Replies ]

To: Crystal Cove

I think the newest USGS report from April 2008 seems to contradict the 1999 report because of the advancement of technology. In 1990, there was “no oil” on our place, but today there is a little. Technology has advanced so much more than we had in 1990.


515 posted on 09/12/2008 6:22:31 PM PDT by tillacum (Nobama, a man who is never in doubt and always in error, vote Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 473 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson