Someone (other than me) shooting my AK knock-off. (In New Jersey No less.)
Posted on 09/08/2008 3:47:11 AM PDT by sig226
Semi-automatics, like all firearms other than machine guns, fire one shot when the trigger is pulled, and they reload themselves after each shot. They were introduced in the 1880s and account for about 15 percent of the 250+ million firearms in the United States. Of new firearms sold in the United States during the last 20 years, semi-automatics account for about 75 percent of handguns, and a significant share of rifles and shotguns.
In the mid-1980s, anti-gun groups invented the term “assault weapon” and applied it to semi-automatic firearms that look like modern, fully-automatic military rifles, hoping to trick the public into thinking that the two were identical. As one such group put it, “The weapons’ menacing looks, coupled with the public’s confusion over fully automatic machine guns versus semi-automatic assault weapons—anything that looks like a machine gun is assumed to be a machine gun—can only increase the chance of public support for restrictions on these weapons.” (Machine guns have been regulated since 1934, prohibited from importation and manufacture since 1968 and 1986, respectively, and are prohibited by about half the states.)
In 1989, the BATF banned the importation of 43 military-looking semi-automatic rifles equipped with various external attachments, such as a pistol-like grip, folding stock or flash suppressor. (E.g., rifles fashioned after the AK-47 and Uzi.) In 1993, it banned the importation of handguns having a similar styling, generally referred to with the slang term “assault pistols.” In 1994, it prohibited the importation of revolving cylinder shotguns and one semi-automatic shotgun, by subjecting them to the National Firearms Act. In 1998, it expanded the 1989 ban, to prohibit importation of rifles capable of using magazines designed for guns BATF banned in 1989. These bans remain in effect.
Between 1994-2004, federal law prohibited the manufacture of semi-automatics with the same external attachments, calling them “assault weapons,” and magazines holding more than 10 rounds, for any firearm. Between 1989-2000, several states passed similar laws. Gun control groups now want bans that define “assault weapon” to include a greater variety of semi-automatics, plus pump-action rifles and shotguns.
NRA opposes reinstating the federal “assault weapon” ban, imposing an expanded federal ban, and similar bans at the state level, for a variety of reasons, including:
Like all firearms other than fully-automatic firearms (machine guns), a semi-automatic fires only one shot when the trigger is pulled. Therefore, semi-automatics cannot “spray fire,” nor are they “easy to convert” to do so. Federal law prohibits manufacturing an easily convertible firearm, converting a firearm, and making or possessing conversion parts.
Semi-automatics are not “high-powered.” Semi-automatic center-fire pistols use ammunition similar in power to center-fire revolver ammunition. All other semi-automatics (rifles, shotguns and rimfire pistols) use the same ammunition as other firearms (bolt-action, lever-action, pump-action, revolver, single-shot, etc.).
Semi-automatics are the type of firearm used most often for self-defense, training and competitive marksmanship, and are commonly used for hunting. They’re used to defend against crime much more often than to commit crime and, like every other kind of firearm, the vast majority are owned by people who do not commit crimes. External attachments such as a pistol-like grip, folding stock or flash suppressor don’t change how a firearm operates or provide an advantage to a criminal.
“Assault weapons” have never been used in more than about 1-2 percent of violent crime. A study for Congress found that the federal ban affected guns “never used in more than a modest fraction of all gun murders,” and that its 10-round limit on new ammunition magazines didn’t reduce multiple-victim or multiple-wound crimes. There are more than 30 times as many murders without guns, as with “assault weapons.” Most, if not all, crimes committed with “assault weapons” could also be committed with a different firearm or by other means.
Since 1991, the number of firearms in the U.S. has risen by more than 75 million (one-third of them semi-automatic, including several million guns defined as “assault weapons” in the now-expired federal ban of 1994), the number of magazines that hold more than 10 rounds has risen by more than 50 million, and the U.S. violent crime and murder rates have decreased 39 percent and 44 percent, respectively.
* * Some other articles linked at the site:
Related Fact Sheets:
Semi-Automatic Firearms and the “Assault Weapon” Issue
Semi-Automatic Firearms and the “Assault Weapon” Issue Summary
Why State Legislatures Should Reject Semi-Automatic and Pump-Action...
McCarthy Bill Bans Millions More Guns Than The Infamous Clinton Gun...
Top 10 Reasons The Clinton Gun Ban Was Allowed To Expire
There's a video, too, starring your friends Schumer, Brady, Rather, etc. You may want to keep a barf bag handy if you watch it.
ping
My SLR-95 Bulgarian AK gives me a warm fuzzy feeling. I like semi-autos. Fun to shoot!
None of my semi auto weapons have ever jumped out of the gun rack, out the front door and gone off to commit a crime.
They are very well behaved.
Mine are extremely well behaved as well. I keep them locked in a safe for their own security and my own peace of mind. I wish I could do the same with my daughter. (Sigh)
I don’t own one of those scary-looking assault guns. I have a nice safe Mini-14. I don’t own one of those “Sniper rifles” either. I just have a Model 70 30-06 with a 3-12 power scope.
Someone (other than me) shooting my AK knock-off. (In New Jersey No less.)
I just bought a Yugoslavian M70B and haven't even fired it yet.
I bought it the day after the Lord High Obama (most merciful and benevolent) specifically mentioned AKs in his acceptance speech.
I'll probably get a Saiga next.
Yeah, I’ve been thinking about getting their 410 shotgun version.
Can someone here answer this question for me. I was "discussing" the semi-auto/full-auto thing with a lib about a month ago and I made the statement that the ATF will put you in a Federal Pen for possessing the parts to convert an AR-15 to and M-16. He said no one have every done hard time (Leavenworth) for parts possession. I made my statement based upon my memory of reading a story regrading the ATF putting a guy away for conversion parts and his sentence was a hard Federal pen. I can find no reference to that on the net. There are a few scattered stories about them busting people but most seem to be pled out or minimum time.
Anyone have more info?
“Constructive Intent” as the BATFE has defined
If you are in posession of the parts AND a rifle in which those parts may be fitted, you are guilty of “constructive intent” and, for all purposes, posessing the actual machinegun. (M-16 fire control group and an AR-15).
Even if those parts are not fitted into the gun or the holes (AR-15) for the sear aren’t drilled.
The only issue should be what attachments are on your rifle, if any.
And I don’t mean looking to ban any kind of attachment.
How the heck do you get an AK knock-off in NJ?
How was his eye afterwards?
He was fine ... that’s just him setting up. He’s actually a pretty good shot.
The trick is to get a “single stack” magazine that only holds 10 rounds, and make sure there is a lug welded to the barrel. If they ever get rid of the AWB, a little quick work with a dremel and you’ve got a high cap knock off.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.