Skip to comments.
Will New York Times Palin Hitpiece Lead to the Mother of All Boycotts?
September 7, 2008
Posted on 09/07/2008 7:13:42 PM PDT by Diago
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-84 next last
1
posted on
09/07/2008 7:13:42 PM PDT
by
Diago
To: Diago
2
posted on
09/07/2008 7:14:24 PM PDT
by
Diago
(The Truth About Margaret Sanger at http://margaretsanger.blogspot.com/)
To: Diago
it may not be a hitpiece, we dont know.
3
posted on
09/07/2008 7:16:37 PM PDT
by
sunmars
To: Diago
Hit the advertisers that will kill them. Massive selling of their stock will follow.
4
posted on
09/07/2008 7:16:49 PM PDT
by
scooby321
To: Diago
5
posted on
09/07/2008 7:16:57 PM PDT
by
Diago
(The Truth About Margaret Sanger at http://margaretsanger.blogspot.com/)
To: Diago
Settle down, we dont know if it is a hit piece or not. We should all boycott them regardless anyways.
6
posted on
09/07/2008 7:17:52 PM PDT
by
aft_lizard
(One animal actually its eats its own brains to conserve energy, we call them liberals.)
To: Diago
Only liberal college professors in the middle west read the NYT, but the people in fly-over country will hear on TV about whatever the slimebergers have to print...and rack up some more votes for McCain.
7
posted on
09/07/2008 7:17:57 PM PDT
by
Stayfree
(***********************************************If it is left, it can't be right!!)
To: Diago
Yes. I still read the Times for the obits only.
8
posted on
09/07/2008 7:18:33 PM PDT
by
mh
To: Diago
i’m not feeling good about this baby story
9
posted on
09/07/2008 7:21:00 PM PDT
by
devane617
(Fish died on his Harley when he hit a camel at dusk.)
To: mh
Should be an entry for Obama, Barrack soon....
To: aft_lizard
I agree, but we are talking about the NY Slimes here.
When exactly did they NOT have a hitpiece against Republicans, conservatives and America?
To: mh
Maybe it won’t be a hit piece - maybe they’ll make up for the other 3 articles...
But, maybe we should just cancel subscriptions to ALL Liberal newspapers. Seems like that is what it’s coming to.
To: Diago
As the NYT is about to find out...don't mess with Sarah's baby boy, Trig.


13
posted on
09/07/2008 7:23:46 PM PDT
by
Jeff Head
(Freedom is not free...never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
To: Diago
I quit the Cleveland Plain Dealer when it became nothing but copies of NYT by-lines, and leftist propoganda/talking points on the Editorial Pages. Now, the Democrat-run Russo Cuyahoga County Machine is being investigated by the FBI for corruption, racketeering, money-laundring, etc., which is why the Ohio vote controlled by these shysters goes crazy to the Left (between the Democrat-controlled metro-machines, and the entitlements-dependent voterbase, they continue to vote for the Dennis Kookcinich and Sherrod Brownes)....
Ohio is in BAD shape politically....
14
posted on
09/07/2008 7:24:06 PM PDT
by
traditional1
("The American presidency is not supposed to be a journey of personal discovery")
To: Diago
My fish will get pissed, but I’ll cancel their subscription to the New York Times.
To: Diago
It would be interesting if the Right did a total boycott of NYT products, at the same time the Left boycotts MSNBC for de-anchoring Matthews and Olbermann.
As for circulation, I was recently at a small hotel in Utah. They GAVE me USA Today, and in the lobby was a stack of NYT, LAT, and some Chicago paper. That counts toward their circulation! There were probably as many papers as there were rooms.
This is why the Left does those big paper maiche heads for their parades and protests- lots and lots of raw material.
16
posted on
09/07/2008 7:26:37 PM PDT
by
DBrow
To: Diago
There will be no effective boycott. Palin sells. Democraps lie about her, we defend her, but she is always the topic. Most of the threads here are about Palin. The liberal hate machine is the same. There will be no boycott, if anything, sales will increase on that issue.
17
posted on
09/07/2008 7:31:51 PM PDT
by
GregoTX
(The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.)
To: Diago
Are there enough conservatives still subscribing to the NYT to launch an effective boycott?
I should hope not.
To: Diago
What’s to expose’? The baby has Down’s Syndrome, which quite often occurs when “older” women have children, but not always. Actually I thought Sarah was youngish to have a Down Syndrome child.
19
posted on
09/07/2008 7:35:12 PM PDT
by
madison10
(Pray for McCains, Palins and the USA...and the rest of us, too.)
To: TheNewPundit
Are there enough conservatives still subscribing to the NYT to launch an effective boycott? I should hope not.That's the correct question.....and answer! Why would any conservative purchase that trash to begin with? It long ago lost its mystic as a status symbol.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-84 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson