To: FlingWingFlyer
You assume Hillary would accept the VP offer. She and Bubba are too smart for that. Why go down in defeat in 2008 when they know the Dems will be on their knees begging her to accept the nomination in 2012?
To: medscribe
THAT will be a fun election: Palin vs. Hillary......... Sarah will trounce her.........
39 posted on
09/07/2008 1:23:42 PM PDT by
ALASKA
(I feel more like I do today than I did yesterday.....)
To: medscribe
THAT will be a fun election: Palin vs. Hillary........ Sarah will TROUNCE her.....
49 posted on
09/07/2008 1:29:45 PM PDT by
ALASKA
(I feel more like I do today than I did yesterday.....)
To: medscribe
Why go down in defeat in 2008 when they know the Dems will be on their knees begging her to accept the nomination in 2012? That might have been true before Sarah - but now it'll be Hillary against Sarah in 2012 - and Sarah will win.
65 posted on
09/07/2008 1:48:35 PM PDT by
GOPJ
("Vegetarian" - Old Indian word for "bad hunter")
To: medscribe
You assume Hillary would accept the VP offer. She and Bubba are too smart for that. Why go down in defeat in 2008 when they know the Dems will be on their knees begging her to accept the nomination in 2012? By all rights, FReepers oughta be calling you Captain Obvious for making that statement, but it seems that the obvious ain't quite so obvious to some at this point. LOL
Thanks for pointing this out.
66 posted on
09/07/2008 1:48:58 PM PDT by
Windflier
(To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
To: medscribe
I bet the have already focus grouped the viabilty of dumping biden.
146 posted on
09/08/2008 5:47:32 AM PDT by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson