Posted on 09/03/2008 10:52:06 AM PDT by TexasCajun
83% say no...nice...
66535 votes
Take That you stupid Libs !
hopefully mccain will hit hard on the bias in msm and use US as an example, show the covers
Done.
It combines the people who are for her and won't change with the ones who are against her and won't change and compares that to those who change either from a NO to a YES or from a YES to a NO.
Those results are SO meaningful...
the yes votes are all those libs who are angry that another conservative will be born
are they they ones that paid jaime spears all the money for her “story” and they celebrated it?
The question could be phrased better. If I am dead set about voting for Palin (I am), then the pregnancy will not affect my decision. If I am dead set against voting for Palin (like brain dead media folks, college professors, and people who can’t determine their own gender) than it also will not affect my decision.
Word is out that high profile Barack Obama supporter and Us Weekly Magazine publisher Jann Wenner is using his magazine to smear Governor Sarah Palin from grocery store check out aisles and newsstands across the country. (h/t Michelle Malkin)
I read that another of their polls was pulled because it was too favorable (4:1) to Palin. The owner/publisher of Us has maxed out on his donations to Obama (he was the originator of Rolling Stone) and we know he has no bias and if it did it surely would not carry over to any publcation over which he has control. Right?
It’s like those right-track/wrong-track polls.
Probably so, but I find it interesting that this site is for mush-brain idol watchers.
Idol groupies whose idols are almost all Liberal Democrats.
I’ll vote when there is an option for “Shove off to Havana you stinking Commies”
Hopefully, the way the Obama groupies are smearing her, it will swing some compassionate independents this way.
Jann Wenner is also one of the heads of the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame...bi-sexual..liberal to the core...head of Rolling Stone...has put Obama on the cover twice already...and oh yeah...says the band Rush will never get into the rock and roll hall of fame because they haven’t accomplished anything worthwhile to get in.
Yeah...a man of sound judgement and reason.
The question IS poorly phrased, but I voted NO, for what it’s worth.
Sixteen percent won’t vote for somebody because that person’s daughter is pregnant? What’s the IQ of these people?
Just look at what they read.
DefeatLeftWingPrintMedia
I have an idea on how to “give it back” to the left-wing media. Civil disobedience sort of. I have been doing a variation of this for years but only occasionally.
Since the major print media (Newsweek, Time) and the lefty “serious” opinion (Atlantic, Harpers, New Yorker) is usually placed on the front shelves in the magazine racks most places: Borders, B Daltons, Smiths grocery, Albertsons grocery. And the magazines on the right (Weekly Standard, National Review, NewsMax) are behind in the back rows, I pull some from the back and place them in front of the lefty junk.
So my idea, inspired by the US Mag anti-Palin scandal, is this. Whenever you see one of these mags, in the grocery store checkout or where ever, simply take the entire stack and either reverse it and put it back in the same spot. Or, maybe better, gently set the offending mags face down on the floor by the rack.
No vandalism, no theft, no damage, and no fight with any employees. Martin Luther King would be proud. Maybe even Ghandi.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.