Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: GeorgiaDawg32

Amen on getting ridiculouser. The latest one I’ve seen from rabid DU-types is that Sarah was extremely selfish by a) having any baby at all at 44 (high odds of Down’s) or b) Going to term with the child, thus forcing taxpayers to pay for all the special ed and therapies the child will need.


16 posted on 08/31/2008 8:06:25 AM PDT by BuckyKat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: BuckyKat

That is awful. I just had a baby and I am 45. The baby is healthy. I didn’t plan it. Women do sometimes get pregnent, it happens. What was she supposed to do, go out and get an abortion the second she found out because she was 44? As far as I know, abortion is the only sure way to not have kids. The Democrats are so anti-family. They have created a generation of paranoid people who think it is dangerous to have kids after the age of 35. It used to be that women continued to have children util they went through the change. This just demonstrates what a good job the Democrats have done of making people anti-family. I really admire the lady. She is a great family person who stood by her beliefs. Those people envy her, because she is not like how they are.


51 posted on 08/31/2008 9:09:47 AM PDT by rodeo-mamma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: BuckyKat

“b) Going to term with the child, thus forcing taxpayers to pay for all the special ed and therapies the child will need.”

Uh....isn’t that the plan that Democrats want for all of us? To get free healthcare and all our needs taken care of via. Taxes.


64 posted on 08/31/2008 11:42:37 AM PDT by RatsDawg (I love Palin :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson