Does Obama-Biden want to attack Afghanistan, Pakistan, Russia and India?

I don’t get it … so Biden is telling us that Obama and the Democrats want to attack Afghanistan, Pakistan, and also crack down on Russia? But they also want to pull out of Iraq so that our “troops can come home”?

I don’t get it, because anytime I talk with the base of Obama, these are leftists who, yes, want to pull out of Iraq, and they want and will demand that we pull out of anyplace we go, because they think that America is the problem, the war monger.

So I am to believe that now Obama and the Democrats running everything, the Congress, the Courts, the Executive, that they are going to send our troops all over the place and increase the troops in Afghanistan, and attack Pakistan (which Biden said is the central front in the war), and go after Russia … and …

And, Biden, I know I heard him say it, he said how we are seeing the rise of India, and he put it in the same context of the perceived horrors of global warming and such.

So the Democrats are going to attack India, too? Because India is progressing economically, militarily, and we see a rising middle class in India, and their people demand oil just like any other nation that has a middle class?

You see, I don’t see India as my enemy. And what we need to do is drill for more oil. Because the demand for crude will rise more and more, with every year, and that is the facts and no windmills and solar power are going to stop the demand from nations such as China, India, Russia, and soon all of Eastern Europe is going to rise economically, and Australia, and others, will be world class powers, and the Middle Class will be global, and they will need and demand nuclear energy, and oil, and the demand will rise, and rise. And we can be a provider of oil, we, the United States, can provide that for our people, and for the world, just as the Middle East does now.

But I guess what the Democrats want to do is attack India with bombs and God knows what. Of course, the Islamic terrorists also want to attack India.

The fact is, the base of the Obama camp, they want America to retreat on every front.

The Democrats will do nothing in Afghanistan, or Pakistan, or to Russia, or to India, because they will destroy our economy such that we will not be able to afford to stand up to anyone. We will have too many problems of our own. And, their base will continue to demand to “get out of (wherever)”. They will not want to “punish Russia (for invading Georgia)” – they want to put our own troops and our own leaders into prison for war crimes.

They howl at the Democratic Convention “out of Iraq” – McCain is wrong about everything, the surge was a failure, get out, get out now, on and on they go.

And then I am suppose to believe Biden tell us that Obama and the Democrats want to attack, attack, attack everyone else.

Oh, so we attack everyone else, we fight everywhere else, but just that we don’t fight in Iraq.

What’s the difference between attacking and fighting in Iraq, and what would result if we attacked and fight in Pakistan?

Wouldn’t we have to occupy Pakistan, not for one decade as in Iraq, but for fifty years minimum in Pakistan?

If the argument of how we have less friends in the world because of Iraq is true, then wouldn’t we have even less friends in the world if we attack Pakistan, “crack down”on Russia, blame India, attack, attack, attack?

The same arguments they use to tell us to get out of Iraq, wouldn’t that be the same logic to get out of Afghanistan, or Pakistan, or Russia, or India, or anyplace else?

Yeah, Obama wants to pull all of the troops out of Iraq to send them to Afghanistan, and bomb Pakistan but leave Iran alone, and then help liberate South Ossetia from Georgia like Clinton did in Kosovo.

The same arguments they use to tell us to get out of Iraq, wouldn’t that be the same logic to get out of Afghanistan, or Pakistan, or Russia, or India, or anyplace else?

No. Bush sent the troops into Iraq, so that is wrong. He didn't sent them into Pakistan, Russia, or India, so that must be right. Obama has delusions of grandeur, and to prove he is a "great" President he must have a war somewhere - just as long as it isn't "Bush's war" - (he wouldn't get any credit for that). As far as his base is concerned, once he gets into power he'll throw them under the bus if they get unruly. (He knows how to deal with dissidents, as shown by his attacks on radio and TV stations that have "troublemakers" on their programs.)

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.