Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/22/2008 12:16:08 PM PDT by Publius804
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Publius804
"Three months ago, Guy Distaffen switched Internet providers, lured from his cable company to his phone company by a year of free service on a two-year contract. But soon the company quietly updated its policies to say it would limit his Internet activity each month.

"We felt that were suckered," said Distaffen, who lives in the small village of Silver Springs in upstate New York."

Is this even legal? Do folks like him have remedy?

2 posted on 08/22/2008 12:21:45 PM PDT by the anti-liberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Publius804
Frontier Communications Corp.

Just coincidence that the initials are FCC?

3 posted on 08/22/2008 12:24:33 PM PDT by Zack Attack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Publius804

Was this disclosed before he signed up? (even in fine print?)


4 posted on 08/22/2008 12:27:08 PM PDT by TruthWillWin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ShadowAce

ping


9 posted on 08/22/2008 12:59:23 PM PDT by bamahead (Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master. -- Sallust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Publius804

All ISPs enforce ‘bandwidth shaping’. In one form or another.


10 posted on 08/22/2008 1:07:59 PM PDT by gilor (Pull the wool over your own eyes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Publius804

“Three months ago, Guy Distaffen switched Internet providers, lured from his cable company to his phone company by a year of free service on a two-year contract. But soon the company quietly updated its policies to say it would limit his Internet activity each month.

So the guy rolled the dice and gasmbled and lost now he is pissed.
He had a internet seive provider and by his admission only left because he thought he could get it cheaper.
Turns out as most people with common sense know that cheaper is not always better...


11 posted on 08/22/2008 1:19:22 PM PDT by SECURE AMERICA (Got Freedom ? Thank a Veteran...... Want to keep Freedom? Don't vote Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rdb3; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; GodGunsandGuts; CyberCowboy777; Salo; Bobsat; JosephW; ...

13 posted on 08/22/2008 2:46:28 PM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Publius804
by a year of free service on a two-year contract. But soon the company quietly updated its policies to say it would limit his Internet activity each month.

The little bit of contract law I know would say this guy has a good chance of getting out of his contract since they changed the terms to something he obviously wouldn't have agreed to in the beginning.

14 posted on 08/22/2008 2:58:39 PM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Publius804

Well, if they believe he should legally be bound even if they change the terms, he should just unilaterally change the monthly rate, and they should have to accept that.


16 posted on 08/22/2008 9:32:45 PM PDT by Still Thinking (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Publius804

If an ISP is going to charge a metered rate, they should be forced to say so in big, bold letters. They talk honestly about the fact that they are trying to convert people to a metered service from “unlimited” usage, because the marketplace as already spoken loudly against it. These days they try to sneak it in because being honest loses customers.


17 posted on 08/23/2008 7:55:44 AM PDT by zeugma (Mark Steyn For Global Dictator!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson