Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

It Don’t Add Up!
National Review Online ^ | August 11, 2008 | Marlo Lewis

Posted on 08/14/2008 9:16:50 PM PDT by ChessExpert

There’s been no net global warming in the 21st century. Although seldom reported by the mainstream media, it’s quite a story, because no climate model predicted it.

(Excerpt) Read more at planetgore.nationalreview.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: climatechange; environment; globalwarming; gorwellianconsensus
Chart included. This SHOULD refute global warming once and for all.

Increased warming was predicted by all modelers even on the assumption that CO2 levels did not increase. CO2 levels increased and there should have been even more warming. In fact there was no cooling. The climate models are no good!

1 posted on 08/14/2008 9:16:50 PM PDT by ChessExpert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ChessExpert

correction: In fact, there was cooling.


2 posted on 08/14/2008 9:19:00 PM PDT by ChessExpert (Carbon Dioxide is not a pollutant. It is a trace gas that is necessary for life on earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChessExpert

That’s a very sanguine attitude. The one thing you can count on is that the neither the idealogues nor the conmen are going to give up their highly profitable boondoggle any time soon.


3 posted on 08/14/2008 9:25:39 PM PDT by Nipfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChessExpert

The link to the Study referred to in the article does not work. Does anyone know anywhere else it is available? I need all the ammunition I can find!


4 posted on 08/14/2008 9:28:38 PM PDT by Nipfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nipfan

Here’s the link to the study by Canedell et al. (2007) referred to in the article, direct from the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences:

http://www.pnas.org/content/104/47/18866.full?sid=32b45c0f-ac23-4930-b950-6a235a832d00


5 posted on 08/14/2008 10:31:04 PM PDT by seowulf (Discipline knows no emotion and frequently runs counter to the whims of panic or elation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: seowulf

Thank you.

They’re obviously beating the human induced global warming drum. Strangely, they don’t seem to have made the connection to real world outcomes.


6 posted on 08/14/2008 10:37:12 PM PDT by Nipfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ChessExpert

Speaking of global warming, I caught a blurb on The Simpsons when I was going through the channels tonight to see if I could find a preseason NFL game.

Homer, Marge and kids are sitting in their house in their warm winter coats, scarves and hats, freezing. Marge says “Homer, you should have paid the electric bill!” Homer says, “I thought global warming would take care of it. Al Gore, you can’t get anything right!”

The above is paraphrased, as I can’t remember exactly what was said, but I LOL’d...


7 posted on 08/14/2008 10:48:46 PM PDT by Theresawithanh (I've got the fevah!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nipfan
Strangely, they don’t seem to have made the connection to real world outcomes.

Ahhh, but they're not living in the real world. They're living in computer models.

8 posted on 08/14/2008 10:50:01 PM PDT by seowulf (Discipline knows no emotion and frequently runs counter to the whims of panic or elation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ChessExpert

I have read somewhere before that temperatures peaked in ‘98 and have been on a downard trend ever since. Every retort I’ve ever heard criticises “anecdotal evidence” or assures us that “temperature is not climate.” When someone asks them to tell us how they are so sure that the climate is charging headlong into warming when it hasn’t warmed since ‘98, they jabber about computer models or dig back in time to the same old charts showing carbon and temperature rising together in the nineteenth century. When you point out that the computer models did not predict what experience has shown, they jump into some mumbo-jumbo about how carbon throws everything out of whack, and how global warming causes both warming and cooling, or some such nonsense.
Since global warming theory has been around for decades, my question is why, oh why, did the green explosion hit us (and the marketing industry) with such fury? As I remember things, since I’ve been alive, environmentalism was always in the background, like white noise. Then, with Gore’s “Inconvenient Truth”—which was pretty convenient for his pocketbook—green was “it”: the political and economic fad of fads. That was in 2006, eight years AFTER peak global temperature. What they heckfire?


9 posted on 08/15/2008 12:02:14 AM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChessExpert

Wow. What a denier. The science is settled. Climate change is running wild. </s>


10 posted on 08/15/2008 2:39:54 AM PDT by pas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChessExpert; Genesis defender; proud_yank; FrPR; enough_idiocy; rdl6989; IrishCatholic; Normandy; ..
 




Beam me to Planet Gore !

11 posted on 08/15/2008 3:47:00 AM PDT by steelyourfaith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChessExpert
In fact, there was cooling.

We're all going to BURN FREEZE to death!

12 posted on 08/15/2008 4:35:34 AM PDT by Mad Dawg (Oh Mary, conceived without sin, pray for us who have recourse to thee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: steelyourfaith

Early snow in Rocky Mountains.
http://www.9news.com/news/article.aspx?storyid=97578&catid=339


13 posted on 08/15/2008 10:09:00 PM PDT by rdl6989
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Tublecane; pas; ChessExpert
I have read somewhere before that temperatures peaked in ‘98 and have been on a downward trend ever since. Every retort I’ve ever heard criticises “anecdotal evidence” or assures us that “temperature is not climate.”

Properly, respond to these AGW religious extremists with tender loving care:
Tell them that temperatures rose 1/2 of one degree between 1890 and 1935, fell 1/2 of one degree between 1935 and 1970, rose 1/2 of one degree between 1973 and 1998, and have been falling ever since.

Remind them that Bush solved global warming, and that temperatures since 1998 have declined worldwide, while CO2 levels have been steadily increasing bout 1% percent per year the whole time through every cycle.

Yes, temperatures (and solar intensity) rose from 1973 to 1998, a total of 25 years. But for ten years, temperatures have declined.

Now, after a very cold winter of 2007-2008 (and into the beginning of the new winter of 1009!) temperatures are no hotter than they were 40 years ago!

So the “TREND” they are so concerned about has canceled itself over a very long period of time.

14 posted on 08/16/2008 6:04:50 PM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson