Replies

McCrone's 1978 studies which have not stood up to peer review have been falsified by over 100 other scientist in peer reviewed scientific journals in the 30 years since he published them in his own vanity journal The Microscope. Your assertion that his conclusions are still valid flies in the face of numerous articles and studies that prove him mistaken at best, or agenda driven liar at worst.

Your assertion that world class scientists are using "pseudoscience" and that well respected scientific journals would publish such "psuedoscience" reveals your ignorance and your agenda. I have provided numerous links to peer reviewed science that post-dates McCrone and prove beyond any doubt that what he claims he saw in his polarized light microscope simply is not there. Your clinging to this discredited nonsense makes you not worth bothering with. You do not read the articles written by scientist far more expert than McCrone in the fields that they are writing about or you merely ignore them because their validated conclusions do not agree with your preconceived prejudices.

Your purpose here is to throw spit wads and be irritating in hopes of eliciting an intemperate response so you can hit the abuse button. Your agenda is not discussion but disruption. You demand links and citations that when provided you then ignore as if they don't exist. I am done wasting my time with you.