Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/07/2008 11:23:53 PM PDT by Brian_Baldwin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Brian_Baldwin
I LOVE Romney. The only problem is, McCain and Romney could never stand on the same stage together since John McCain looks like a midget next to Mitt.

Sounds good. The politics are good.

But ... it just doesn't LOOK good.

Would it be possible for them to campaign together on the same ticket, but never appear in before the public or camera on the same stage?

Perhaps it is possible in this day and age?

They could split talk shows and talk radio. Just, never appear together on the same stage (unless they have John standing on a milk cart which is hidden from the camera.

2 posted on 08/07/2008 11:26:49 PM PDT by Brian_Baldwin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brian_Baldwin
MITT-VEEP '08

GOP 1854-2008

3 posted on 08/07/2008 11:29:59 PM PDT by Mojave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brian_Baldwin

http://blog.washingtonpost.com/sleuth/2008/08/mitt_for_veep_stopping_joggers.html

“”The veep frenzy is getting crazier by the minute. One Sleuth informant this morning was certain he had cracked the mystery of who will become John McCain’s running mate. The evidence was a big, glossy poster with Mitt Romney’s face on it and the message “MITT FOR VEEP/McCain-Romney ‘08” being carried under the arm of one Ron Kaufman, the hotshot Washington lobbyist who served as a senior adviser to Romney’s presidential campaign.

Signs of a ‘Romney for Veep’ Movement? Our informant says he saw Kaufman walking to his car carrying “a couple of McCain-Romney ‘08 placards.” Maybe he was on his way to McCain headquarters with the signs.

Actually, it was just one sign. “I stole it, to be honest,” Kaufman tells the Sleuth.

The lobbyist was out jogging this morning and saw the “Mitt for Veep” sign posted on a lamppost at the corner of 6th Street SE and Pennsylvania Avenue.

“I was shocked,” says Kaufman, who actually cost Romney some grief on the campaign trail after the former Massachusetts governor declared, “I don’t have lobbyists running my campaign.”

Kaufman liked the sign so much that he took it. “I said to myself, ‘No one will believe I didn’t make this.’ But I’m innocent, for once,” he told us by phone.

In small lettering along the side, the McCain-Romney sign touts the Web site MittforVeep.com, where — for a mere two bucks — you, too, can own a “Mitt for Veep” sign.

While Romney is actively campaigning today for the man who could choose him as a running mate, he continues to be coy about his prospects on the GOP ticket.

But you can imagine where Kaufman comes down on the issue.

“He’d be a great pick,” Kaufman says, adding that McCain either needs to pick “a solid Republican who energizes the base” or someone who “reinforces McCain’s brand as an independent Republican.” And Romney, he says, “is a solid Republican who would energize the base.”

Stay tuned to see whether Mitt will have that opportunity.””


4 posted on 08/07/2008 11:32:56 PM PDT by iowamark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brian_Baldwin

Economic “conservatives” interested in a little fascism and corporate welfare like this guy, I guess.


8 posted on 08/08/2008 12:28:05 AM PDT by unspun (Mike Huckabee: Government's job is "protect us, not have to provide for us.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brian_Baldwin

I was in Sioux City, Iowa recently and suprised as they still have Romney signs up. Not just at some peoples houses but some of those big placard ones. I was there on cacucus night early this year as well. The conservative counties went for Romney the liberal ones went to Huck, McCain came in third. Seems like the conservatives there are still hopeful for VP.


12 posted on 08/08/2008 5:50:14 AM PDT by Rameumptom (Gen X= they killed 1 in 4 of us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brian_Baldwin; ejonesie22; colorcountry; fieldmarshaldj
Photobucket
16 posted on 08/08/2008 7:06:49 AM PDT by greyfoxx39 (1992...how many folks had heard of Bill Clinton? John McCain, Eric Cantor for your VP pick!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brian_Baldwin

NO MORE LIBERALS. What part of that do you Slick Willard disciples fail to grasp ?


17 posted on 08/08/2008 7:18:53 AM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brian_Baldwin
I prefer someone a little more masculine than Mitt


21 posted on 08/08/2008 12:42:30 PM PDT by Fred (The Democrat Party is the Nadir of Nihilism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brian_Baldwin

Romney is a liberal.

This is a conservative forum.

Quit advocating liberals on here.


24 posted on 08/08/2008 3:24:21 PM PDT by big'ol_freeper (A vote for third party is a vote for nObama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson