Sorry, I fail to see the point. Are you saying this is a false claim because previous claims have been argued away? Frankly I don’t understand this paragraph as I am not a “jargonator” as most pseudo-scientists like paleontologists are.
I just don’t buy the evolution stuff. They seem to rely on such logical contortions combined with illogical contortions to arrive at conclusions that cannot possbly be verified. Too much for my simple brain to accept, I suppose.
My question has always been: how did animals survive while waiting millions of years for extra, added features to evolve on them that were the one and only thing that made them survive?