Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GM unveils 'fuel-sipping' Camaro
CNN MONEY.COM ^ | Peter Valdes-Dapena

Posted on 07/28/2008 3:09:48 AM PDT by OKIEDOC

When unveiling new performance models, car companies usually boast about horsepower, engine size and expected zero-to-60 times. But when General Motors unveiled the 2010 Chevrolet Camaro Monday afternoon, it was the car's fuel economy numbers that were front and center.

It's the return of a once-popular model that has been out of production since the 2002 model year. V6 versions, which GM expects will be the biggest sellers, are expected to get 26 miles per gallon on the highway. That's about the same as a V6 Ford Mustang, while boasting the same horsepower output as a V8 Mustang.

http://money.cnn.com/galleries/2008/autos/0807/gallery.2010_chevrolet_camaro/index.html

(Excerpt) Read more at money.cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Hobbies; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: camaro; chevy; energy; gasoline; gm; transportation
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last
To: OKIEDOC

looks like a mustang with a pointy front.


61 posted on 07/28/2008 5:51:15 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay
It does have the looks of all three of the American muscle cars in my lowly opinion.
62 posted on 07/28/2008 5:55:44 AM PDT by OKIEDOC (OBAMA aka Post Turtle the Forest Gump of American Politics ABORTION -Liberal Child Abuse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Fresh Wind
Fresh Wind wrote:
And just look what they did the the T-Bird!

Comment:

What an absolute SNAFU by Ford.

63 posted on 07/28/2008 5:58:16 AM PDT by OKIEDOC (OBAMA aka Post Turtle the Forest Gump of American Politics ABORTION -Liberal Child Abuse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: sushiman
"Waste of money not to mention waste of gasoline..."

Every party has a pooper,
That's why we invited you...

64 posted on 07/28/2008 6:00:52 AM PDT by Hatteras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Fresh Wind

I’ll stick with my SAAB’s. Throughout all the energy crap they remain economical, versatile, fun, and quick enough to get the “H” out of their own way.

...and we have title to all three of them.


65 posted on 07/28/2008 6:30:06 AM PDT by rockinqsranch (Say Obama were "Pinky", Then who is "The Brain"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: OKIEDOC
:-) Thanx. I'd say Sushiman got toasted fairly well for his comment about needs. Unfortunately there are a LOT of people who are all to willing to limit what you can do according to their idea of what's right. Most of them will vote for Obama.
66 posted on 07/28/2008 6:47:55 AM PDT by from occupied ga (Your most dangerous enemy is your own government,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: OKIEDOC
V6 versions, which GM expects will be the biggest sellers, are expected to get 26 miles per gallon on the highway traveling at the car's top speed of 26 miles per hour.

Fixed it!!

67 posted on 07/28/2008 7:19:14 AM PDT by DustyMoment (FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OKIEDOC
GM unveils 'fuel-sipping' Camaro

Not unlike "Jumbo Shrimp."

68 posted on 07/28/2008 7:25:04 AM PDT by martin_fierro (FREE LAZZY, YOU BASTARDS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro
1982 2.5 liter 4 cylinder Camaro.

69 posted on 07/28/2008 7:29:15 AM PDT by evets (beer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: OKIEDOC

I still say they should've gone with this student design.

Or even this one.

70 posted on 07/28/2008 7:38:45 AM PDT by martin_fierro (FREE LAZZY, YOU BASTARDS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: evets

Will never forget catching a ride from a classmate one rainy night in 1983 in his shiny black Trans Am.

Then he told me it was a 4-cylinder.

I wanted to get out then & there.


71 posted on 07/28/2008 8:05:10 AM PDT by martin_fierro (FREE LAZZY, YOU BASTARDS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Fresh Wind
The T-bird was a dead model, that they tried to resurrect. The Camaro is a car that they discontinued, just so they could reintroduce it 2 years later. If the Corvette was the size of the Pontiac Solstice, had much more power and was nothing but handling and quality from the ground up, GM would have an equal to the Porche 911. Instead, they have something that looks like Speed Racer's Mach 5, built by the same people that put together the Cobalt.
72 posted on 07/28/2008 8:07:39 AM PDT by Dixie Yooper (Ephesians 6:11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: OKIEDOC
GM unveils 'fuel-sipping' Camaro

If 26 mpg is what GM calls fuel-sipping, GM has already put the For Sale Sign out and called it quits.

73 posted on 07/28/2008 8:11:05 AM PDT by Dixie Yooper (Ephesians 6:11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: A.A. Cunningham
Front looks great. Rear looks like it got squashed. Red is my favorite color although it's hard to tell the shade from that pic.

Man GM has got to respond faster if they want to survive. They dropped the Camaro just when the Mustang was taking off and it's taken them this long to respond.

If the were smart they'd offer the versions. A thrifty 4 cylinder model (maybe turboed). A medium V-6 which got 30MPG highway for us commuters and a fire breathing V8. Bring back the Z-28?

74 posted on 07/28/2008 8:22:51 AM PDT by McGruff ( 'the U.S. Senate Banking Committee, which is my committee' - Barack Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Dixie Yooper
My 2006 Sonata V-6 was advertised at 30 MPG highway. I can get 35 sometimes. And it cranks! GM’s V-6s were claiming 30 MPG highway until the last couple of years. Don't know why their down to 26 MPG now.
75 posted on 07/28/2008 8:27:46 AM PDT by McGruff ( 'the U.S. Senate Banking Committee, which is my committee' - Barack Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: McGruff
Don't know why their down to 26 MPG now.

The EPA changed the calculation to better reflect "real world" conditions, which had the effect of substantially lowering estimated mileage.

I've always gotten more than the EPA estimate, but that's just me...

76 posted on 07/28/2008 8:35:53 AM PDT by Publius Valerius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: OKIEDOC
Have you told the dealership that an ugly dash might cause you to have second thoughts.

I did tell a sales guy in 1994 that I thought the Z-28 dash controls were cheap POS. When asked why, I reached in and flipped up the turn indicator stalk. Made a most disagreeable CRACK like it was breaking off. Told him that was just one of several things about the interior that was unacceptably cheap. May be no big deal to GM drivers, but not me.

77 posted on 07/28/2008 11:00:34 AM PDT by doorgunner69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Dixie Yooper
The T-bird was a dead model, that they tried to resurrect.

Dead since 1958.

78 posted on 07/28/2008 11:01:37 AM PDT by Fresh Wind (Five Year Plans and New Deals, wrapped in golden chains...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: rockinqsranch
...and we have title to all three of them

If there's one thing worse than paying high gas prices, interest on a car loan would have to be it.

79 posted on 07/28/2008 11:08:05 AM PDT by Dixie Yooper (Ephesians 6:11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: sushiman

Sure 400hp is overkill, but so what? Should people be stopped? Why shouldn’t I be able to buy a powerful performance car if I can afford to?

Even enlightened Germany sells Porsches and AMG Mercedes with far more horsepower and far worse mileage.

The US is still a free country where people can choose the car they want, even if it isn’t a three-cylinder cracker-box.


80 posted on 07/28/2008 11:12:44 AM PDT by MediaMole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson