Posted on 07/13/2008 7:08:51 PM PDT by BenLurkin
Fort Collins, CO, July 12, 2008 --(PR.com)-- Radar data obtained by MUFON confirms that there were Unidentified Flying Objects (UFOs) flying above Stephenville, Texas, January 8th, 2008, just as many eyewitnesses had reported and which made headlines worldwide.
MUFON's analysis of the radar data obtained through freedom of information act (FOIA) requests to the National Weather Service and the FAA show that unknown flying objects were on a direct course to President Bush's Crawford ranch and were separate from the known F-16 jets the same radar data confirmed were flying in the area that night. The unknown radar targets, which did not have required identification transponders, exhibited strange flight characteristics beyond that of known civilian or military aircraft.
A press conference to explain MUFON's findings in complete detail will be held on Friday, July 25th, 2008 at 11 am at the Double Tree Hotel in San Jose, California, in conjunction with MUFON's annual Symposium. A full version of MUFON's report and information about the Symposium can be found at: http://www.mufon.com/symposia.htm.
(Excerpt) Read more at pr.com ...
I do think that this is one of the best UFO videos I’ve seen:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5d8tQPcuwtQ
EEEEEE GADS! WHAT A HORRIFIC THING for 7 year olds??? Sheesh!
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread372192/pg1
posted on 16/7/2008 @ 02:48 single this post “quote”REPLY TO:
DIGG ATS
for original
content
more infoIs my 7 year old daughter being prepped for disclosure by her school?
Hi.
Over the last couple of months,my 7 year old daughter has been showing an increased interest in Aliens,UFO’s and the like.
I can recall two of her homework sheets actually depicting both Aliens and UFO’s.One in particular had both my Wife and i scratching our heads.
This particular homework sheet depicted a flying saucer landing in the playground,and the questions being asked on the sheet seemed to be designed to gauge my childs reaction to such an event!
Now,if the school wished my child to express,in writing,her reaction to extreme events,then why use a UFO landing in her playground?
I mean,what does a 7 year old girl now about UFO’s?
Why not use a picture of a lion or something similar?
Anyway,just this week my daughter and i were out on a walk,when suddenly she blurted out that her teacher had told the class before they broke up for the summer,that an Alien landing was going to be happening next July!!
Naturally i was a bit taken aback by this statement,and so i asked my daughter what exactly her teacher had said to the class.
Apparently the teacher had said that Aliens were going to be landing in Africa,Egypt,and Australia to pick something up,(of this my daughter was’nt exactly clear about.Something to do with seeds or plants she thought).The teacher then went on to say that after that,the alien visitors would be seen all round the world,and that the children were not to be afraid,as they had come to help all mankind!
Her teacher then told them that they would learn more about the subject after they returned from summer holidays!
Now i know my daughter can be a bit prone to telling the odd tall tale,but she swore to God that everything she told me was what her teacher had told her.
And besides,i don’t think my daughter knows enough about UFOlogy to be able to come up with this story off the top of her head!
I have met the teacher several times and she seemed to be a nice,sensible person,and not some kind of crackpot.
I will keep you all posted on any further developements,but i would like to know if any other parents out there have had similar stories out of their children?
atsmedia.cachefly.net...
Homework sheet image (A):
http://atsmedia.cachefly.net/uploads/ats56553_alien_sheet.jpg
atsmedia.cachefly.net...
Homework sheet image (B):
http://atsmedia.cachefly.net/uploads/ats56554_alien_sheet_2.jpg
more gleanings from ATS:
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread372415/pg1
Sun event in 2012 seems indicated in recent gliph
May have given this one before—7 year old daughter teacher at school prepped toward thinking of UFO’s and ET’s warmly:
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread372415/pg1
CNN reporter N watch list:
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread372458/pg1
RECURRING UFO DREAMS includine ID4 sized craft
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread372610/pg1
Ricky Sorrells of Stephenville TX huge UFO sighting on Larry King live YOUTUBE:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bo5dogCW-xo
But then, her teacher might have suspended her under a violence “zero tolerance” policy.
Really in love with that
TYPE II ERROR risk, eh?
INDEED.
Please let Las Vegas Dave and I know if you want on or off the list.
Here's a couple of links for the LARRY KING UFO SHOWS online:
HERE: http://www.realufos.net/2008/07/larry-king-ufos-over-us-military-sites_18.html
That one has them linked in sequence.
This one below has 40 such YOUTUBE videos linked:
===========================
Have been expecting what I watched on the Larry King videos tonight for at least 4 decades.
For the first time, on prime time major MSM TV, the debunkers came out looking stupid.
I think folks who are not well read in the field may not realize what a sea change that is even though they are familiar with the debunkers usually winning on the MSM.
The import, to me, is that the puppet masters have changed the bar--raised the bar--or lowered it, I guess. The powers that be have decided they'd better start preparing the masses more overtly and more dramatically--even more candidly--big time for the big changes ahead in terms of wholesale disclosure and/or massive demonstrations of the craft and the realities related to "ET's."
There was nothing that new in the revelations in the Larry King show videos I saw tonight that the well informed didn't already know.
However, to have the decidedly bright, well informed, experienced military folks on who had PERSONAL experiences . . . WITH the very sharp Stanton Friedman physicist . . . dealing with a couple of seeming government stooges who didn't appear to be that bright . . . THAT'S A MAJOR DIFFERENCE.
There were several things said in the segments that were quite important and said convincingly well. I'll try and watch them again and summarize here this weekend.
I'm a bit saddened. While it's comforting to finally see confirmation--public confirmation of things we've known for decades but been derided for believing the truth about--it's sad because:
It means that the level of the satanic deception about all the above is about to be kicked up a few more levels and that masses of world citizens are going to be led even more emphatically down the yellow brick road toward hell.
It also means, imho, that world events are much closer on the brink of becoming extremely more dramatic.
Do you think that these aliens are from Satan or from God? I've seen UFOs and aliens and since I became a Christian I've begun to wonder who they “work” for.
Pleaase run, do not walk, to
Guy Malone used to have visists/abductions as a teen.
The better known, certainly, appear to be wholesale in cahoots with satan toward deceiving the world and setting up the global government.
Some may be ‘cast’ as good guys and some ‘cast’ as bad guys in a good cop/bad cop routine to wholesale deceive the world.
Nephilium in Gen 6; watchers, fallen angels, ET’s all appear to be essentially the same thing.
Guy allows that it is theoretically possible that some are literally other races from other planets and galaxies. Doesn’t sound, in my discussions with him, like he much believes it.
Scripture says that ALL CREATION GROANS, EXPECTANTLY, YEARNINGLY, LONGINGLY for the manifestation of the sons of God. Whatever that means, it likely means . . . for deliverance from evil polluting all creation since the fall.
It is certainly plausible that God on occasion uses technology . . . Ezekiel’s chariot, Jesse Duplantis are two cases in point.
Personally, I don’t think God needs technology. He speaks and things happen. On he other hand, He’s God. He can use whatever He chooses to use.
You might do well to exhort the critters you are observing to leave your turf in the Name of Jesus. Folks who have an authentic relationship with Jesus coverd in His Blood, walking in His Spirit certainly have such authority.
It is conceivable that God is giving you visions, dreams, views for training for dealing with such and helping others to deal with such in the future. However, I’d want to be absolutely certain God was the agent involved in your viewing such before I allowed it, spiritually, to continue.
My 2 cents.
INDEED.
He sure sounded like a paid government shill, to me. How about to you?
His comments were so dogmatic as to be virtually scripted hogwash. Redundant silly scripted hogwash. Stated like a vain mantra.
I loved it when Stanton handed him his head on a platter right off the bat.
Dave, Civ, Doug,
Have you each seen the Larry King show(s)?
Do you see it as the sort of sea change that I do?
What were your responses?
Didn’t see it.
No cable and basically don’t watch TV. I ripped out cable the day Clinton was acquitted in the Senate.
Larry Kind does not need to learn anything. He got where he is lobbing softballs to famous liberals and knows it.
We haven’t had TV for over a year.
But this is available on the net. And well worth watching.
The net links are above.
The first one is the best one for the sequence already provided at that link. The other link has 40 videos on the topic . . . I don’t recall how many with Larry King.
Larry actually did a decent job on this one. That’s one reason I felt it was such a sea change. He’d not have been allowed to do a decent job on it a year ago . . . he’d have had to have sounded skeptical and toward derisiveness, imho.
Actually, they just didn’t want him covering it much until now from all that I’ve seen.
Forgot to ping you, Civ,
We haven’t had TV for over a year.
But this is available on the net. And well worth watching.
The net links are above.
The first one is the best one for the sequence already provided at that link. The other link has 40 videos on the topic . . . I don’t recall how many with Larry King.
Larry actually did a decent job on this one. That’s one reason I felt it was such a sea change. He’d not have been allowed to do a decent job on it a year ago . . . he’d have had to have sounded skeptical and toward derisiveness, imho.
Actually, they just didn’t want him covering it much until now from all that I’ve seen.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.