Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What Nobody is Saying About a National 55 MPH Limit
Self | July 12, 2008 | Self

Posted on 07/12/2008 12:37:30 PM PDT by The Duke

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-165 next last
To: Congressman Billybob

You say we should have a national 55-mph speed limit because we are at war and because it will save lives. If so, why not make it 30 mph, as it was during WWII? Thirty mph would save even more fuel and lives.


121 posted on 07/12/2008 8:01:01 PM PDT by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob
I live at the end of a half-mile gravel road in the Blue Ridge Mountains, 15 minutes from the nearest town, population 1,000.


122 posted on 07/12/2008 8:14:39 PM PDT by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Gondring

I understand you making the assumption considering where our society is, but when you assume you make an ass of u and me.

Yes, I have driven my vehicle at 55 and 70 on the same highway, same weather, same time of day with the same level of traffic, because I was curious. It is my nature to test my theories.


123 posted on 07/13/2008 1:42:37 PM PDT by ThisLittleLightofMine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob
If we the people decide that you must sacrifice your precious time, or stop using your vehicle so much, well that's democracy for you.

So am I to understand that, as a member of Congress, you would vote in favor of setting a national speed limit? Doesn't that bring up the question of whether that is an enumerated right of the federal government?

124 posted on 07/13/2008 1:49:07 PM PDT by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cyber Liberty
Screw this, this isn't sacrifice for war, this is sacrifice for polar bears.

yes indeed...

jimmy carter channeling through warner & friends
125 posted on 07/13/2008 1:59:36 PM PDT by firewalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Hot Tabasco
DON'T PREACH TO ME ABOUT 55 MPH GAS CONSUMPTION VS. 70 MPH GAS CONSUMPTION!
I'VE HEARD IT ALL BEFORE AND IT WAS BULLSHIT THEN JUST AS ITS BULLSHIT NOW.........


Bravo
126 posted on 07/13/2008 2:01:37 PM PDT by firewalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob
1) A lower speed limit means a lower death and injury rate. Presumably, your life has some value.

My choice. Not yours. Not the government's. Freedom almost always sacrifices some security. It's a price most are willing to pay.

2) There ARE other forms of transportation. You have heard of trains, planes, buses and the like, right?

You are familiar with the size of our country and how impossible it is for everyone to use mass trans, right? Not to mention that it takes even more time than just driving 55 MPH.

3) We are at war, and money for oil in foreign hands is one of the weapons against us in that war.

A war that I've helped fight, and I still want to drive 70+ MPH on the highway. Is that OK?

If we the people decide that you must sacrifice your precious time, or stop using your vehicle so much, well that's democracy for you.

Unfortunately, we're not a democracy, we're a constitutional republic. Guess the government has to find some actual reason for their desire to impose limits on our time and how fast we can drive when the REAL solutions to the problem remain the elephants in the room.

I hope you're being facetious about these comments. Otherwise, we're in far greater trouble than I thought.

127 posted on 07/13/2008 2:03:51 PM PDT by Future Snake Eater (Trust me...I know what I'm doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: firewalk

That guy wants to be a congressman.


128 posted on 07/13/2008 2:04:06 PM PDT by Cyber Liberty (Who would McQueeg rather have mad at him: You or the liberals?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: Future Snake Eater

That guy wants to be a congressman.


129 posted on 07/13/2008 2:05:54 PM PDT by Cyber Liberty (Who would McQueeg rather have mad at him: You or the liberals?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: The Duke

When the 4 hour ride to the coast turns into a 6 hour ride, the businesses there can kiss my money goodbye.


130 posted on 07/13/2008 2:07:29 PM PDT by Rebelbase (Black dogs and bacon bombs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cyber Liberty
Screw this, this isn't sacrifice for war, this is sacrifice for polar bears.

Well said. The helluvit is that it's for polar bears who don't need the help.

131 posted on 07/13/2008 2:09:37 PM PDT by Future Snake Eater (Trust me...I know what I'm doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Cyber Liberty
I thought he is a congressman!
132 posted on 07/13/2008 2:10:21 PM PDT by Future Snake Eater (Trust me...I know what I'm doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Future Snake Eater

Wanna be. Just blew it.


133 posted on 07/13/2008 2:11:59 PM PDT by Cyber Liberty (Who would McQueeg rather have mad at him: You or the liberals?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

Where was the “sarcasm” tag?


134 posted on 07/13/2008 2:13:48 PM PDT by DLfromthedesert (Michael Steele for VP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: The Duke

Your argument is a good start. Let’s look further.

Most of the people in the US, the absolute maximum is 65mph, making the fuel savings considerably less. Even then, that speed limit is only on some interstate highways. On those 65mph highways, a large percent of the travel is done during rush hours when the traffic doesn’t approach 65mph, reducing the savings even more.

Consequently, the people who will do most of the slowing down are on rural interstates at off hours. Who are those drivers? Who is it that drives more miles on interstates at off hours? Who uses the most fuel in those cases? Truckers. So, we penalize truckers the most.

Let’s consider truckers. They have to deliver a fixed amount of cargo in a fixed amount of time.

Question: What happens when we slow trucks down 20 percent?

Answer: We now need 20% more trucks and 20% more drivers to deliver the same amount of goods. While there would be some fuel savings, other costs will increase.

1. Since a single truck and driver can now deliver 20% less cargo than before, the fixed costs of the truck and driver must be applied to that cargo, increasing the price of all shipments by a little less than 20%.

2. Trucking companies will need 20% more trucks and drivers, creating new fixed costs like depreciation, insurance and salaries. These new costs will also have to be applied to prices.

The net increase would probably exceed the fuel savings.

So... While there will be some fuel savings associated with a decrease in the maximum speed limit on interstate highways, the resulting inflation will offset much of that savings. The decreased productivity of all people who must now spend more time driving must also be considered.

A far better solution is to find a way to provide the necessary fuel to keep the speed limits as high as possible. For those applications where fuel savings outweigh the associated costs, the drivers can use the right lane and save money.


135 posted on 07/13/2008 2:26:09 PM PDT by Poser (Willing to fight for oil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NittanyLion
The Supreme Court has long since dealt with the constitutional question you raise. 1) Congress has no power to set speed limits on state highways. 2) Congress has every right to set conditions on money it gives to the states (or more recently, to Yale Law School in the military recruiting issue). 3) Therefore, Congress can say, "Please do this; otherwise, no money." Then there is a loud sucking sound, and whoever wants the money VOLUNTARILY changes their behavior.

And that's the name of that tune.

Congressman Billybob

First in the series, "American Government: The Owner's Manual"

Latest article, "Smart as a Whip, Dumb as a Hoe Handle"

136 posted on 07/13/2008 2:29:26 PM PDT by Congressman Billybob ( www.ArmorforCongress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: ThisLittleLightofMine

Good! Glad your vehicle seems to be geared well for the higher speeds! Most aren’t.


137 posted on 07/13/2008 2:38:32 PM PDT by Gondring (I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Cyber Liberty; Congressman Billybob
That guy wants to be a congressman.

Yes, he's run for congress (twice?)
138 posted on 07/13/2008 2:43:59 PM PDT by firewalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: firewalk
No, I no longer seek to be a Congressman. After this primary, I promised myself, my wife and my children that that was it for running for public office.

John / Billybob

139 posted on 07/13/2008 2:49:50 PM PDT by Congressman Billybob ( www.ArmorforCongress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob
wanted to add
I have alot of respect for you.
My comment above is not intended to be rude.
140 posted on 07/13/2008 2:50:21 PM PDT by firewalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-165 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson