Skip to comments.
Teenager finds baby bat in her bra
The Telegraph ^
| 08/07/2008
| Laura Clout
Posted on 07/08/2008 5:23:24 AM PDT by Daffynition
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-82 next last
In case it's a slow news day...
To: Daffynition
That’s not a baby bat, nor is it real.
I’m not casting doubt on the story itself, just that picture.
The wing is clearly shiny and rubber, and the bat is too big to be the “tiny creature” and “baby” as described in the article.
2
posted on
07/08/2008 5:25:58 AM PDT
by
MrB
(You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
To: Daffynition
She said: "Once I realised it was a bat I was shocked, but then I felt quite sorry for it really. Kids these days.
And to think, they get to vote. SCARY!
3
posted on
07/08/2008 5:26:11 AM PDT
by
unixfox
(The 13th Amendment Abolished Slavery, The 16th Amendment Reinstated It !)
To: MrB
To: Daffynition
OK, I admit it!! I often keep my cell phone in my bra. There, I’m glad I finally let that vital piece of information out.
5
posted on
07/08/2008 5:29:10 AM PDT
by
Mercat
(For if their purpose or activity is of human origin, it will fail.)
To: Mercat
OK, I admit it!! I often keep my cell phone in my bra.
To: MrB
Well, duh. The story said they freed the bat that morning.
This is just a pic to draw the reader in.
7
posted on
07/08/2008 5:35:25 AM PDT
by
ShadowAce
(Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
To: Daffynition
To: MrB; mikrofon; martin_fierro
That’s not a baby bat, nor is it real. No, you're right. The real visitor had already escaped:
BAT BOY SHOCKER:
'I WAS TRAPPED
IN A TEENAGE BRA!'
To: Daffynition
Does this mean she can sue the bat for sexual harassment?
On the other hand, if I claim to self-identify as a baby bat, does that mean I can climb into a young woman’s bra while she is wearing it and be free from prosecution?
To: Daffynition
"I will certainly be checking my bras every morning from now on." Words to live by.
To: Larry Lucido
I sure British Muslims are somehow offended.
12
posted on
07/08/2008 5:42:33 AM PDT
by
Dr. Ursus
(( commander of the simian host))
To: unixfox
At least she didn’t squeal, run around in circles, and scream, “IS IT IN MY HAIR????”
13
posted on
07/08/2008 5:43:14 AM PDT
by
arderkrag
(Libertarian Nutcase (Political Compass Coordinates: 9.00, -2.62 - www.politicalcompass.org))
To: Daffynition
Is she absolutely certain it wasn't a Tufted Titmouse?
To: PBRSTREETGANG
Or a Blue-footed Booby.
15
posted on
07/08/2008 5:47:37 AM PDT
by
andy58-in-nh
(A society of sheep must in time beget a government of wolves.)
To: MrB
You seemed to have missed the more important data point in that photo......
With that cup size, she could have lost a small dog in there!!!!
16
posted on
07/08/2008 5:51:58 AM PDT
by
G Larry
(Fight B.O. with RIGHT GUARD! Vote McCain!)
To: Snardius
17
posted on
07/08/2008 5:59:30 AM PDT
by
Chanticleer
(I want God, I want Poetry, I want real danger, I want freedom, I want goodness, I want sin.)
To: G Larry
More evidence is required before forming a conclusion.
18
posted on
07/08/2008 5:59:59 AM PDT
by
MrB
(You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
To: MrB
I’m sure you are absolutely correct ... but the Telegraph just had to have some sort of a picture to go with VS appliance. ;-D
To: Larry Lucido
LOL ... are you glad it wasn’t a beaver?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-82 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson