Yesterday's apod had a copyright notice with a big, fat NO at the source, so I didn't post it. Here's the link if you'd like to take a look.
Fascinating - it has expanded 30 light years from the source in 1000 years .... so what would remain at the source? A neutron star? A dreaded black hole? Anyone want to make a guess, this happy 4th of July??!
Speaking of which (galactic cosmic rays)...
If you look at the chart below, you will see that sunspot activity (during solar maxes--the individual peaks) has been relatively high since about 1900 and almost non-existent for the period between about 1625 and 1725. This period is known as the Maunder (sunspot) Minimum or "Little Ice Age".
From BBC News [yr: 2004]:
"A new [2004] analysis shows that the Sun is more active now than it has been at anytime in the previous 1,000 years. Scientists based at the Institute for Astronomy in Zurich used ice cores from Greenland to construct a picture of our star's activity in the past. They say that over the last century the number of sunspots rose at the same time that the Earth's climate became steadily warmer."..."In particular, it has been noted that between about 1645 and 1715, few sunspots were seen on the Sun's surface. This period is called the Maunder Minimum after the English astronomer who studied it. It coincided with a spell of prolonged cold weather often referred to as the "Little Ice Age". Solar scientists strongly suspect there is a link between the two events - but the exact mechanism remains elusive."
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/3869753.stm
It's really hard to imagine how this little ball of fire could have any impact on our climate at all.
But the main arguments being made for a solar-climate connection is not so much to do with the heat of the Sun but rather with its magnetic cycles. When the Sun is more magnetically active (typically around the peak of the 11 year sunspot cycle --we are a few yrs away at the moment), the Sun's magnetic field is better able to deflect away incoming galactic cosmic rays (highly energetic charged particles coming from outside the solar system). The GCRs are thought to help in the formation of low-level cumulus clouds -the type of clouds that BLOCK sunlight and help cool the Earth. So when the Sun's MF is acting up (not like now), less GCRs reach the Earth's atmosphere, less low level sunlight-blocking clouds form, and more sunlight gets through to warm the Earth's surface...naturally. Clouds are basically made up of tiny water droplets. When minute particles in the atmosphere become ionized by incoming GCRs they become very 'attractive' to water molecules, in a purely chemical sense of the word. The process by which the Sun's increased magnetic field would deflect incoming cosmic rays is very similar to the way magnetic fields steer electrons in a cathode ray tube or electrons and other charged particles around the ring of a subatomic particle accelerator.-ETL
____________________________________________________
There's a relatively new book out on the subject titled The Chilling Stars. It's written by one of the top scientists advancing the theory (Henrik Svensmark).
And here is the website for the place where he does his research:
2008: "The Center for Sun-Climate Research at the DNSC investigates the connection between variations in the intensity of cosmic rays and climatic changes on Earth. This field of research has been given the name 'cosmoclimatology'"..."Cosmic ray intensities – and therefore cloudiness – keep changing because the Sun's magnetic field varies in its ability to repel cosmic rays coming from the Galaxy, before they can reach the Earth." :
http://www.spacecenter.dk/research/sun-climate
100,000-Year Climate Pattern Linked To Sun's Magnetic Cycles:
ScienceDaily (Jun. 7, 2002) HANOVER, N.H.
Thanks to new calculations by a Dartmouth geochemist, scientists are now looking at the earth's climate history in a new light. Mukul Sharma, Assistant Professor of Earth Sciences at Dartmouth, examined existing sets of geophysical data and noticed something remarkable: the sun's magnetic activity is varying in 100,000-year cycles, a much longer time span than previously thought, and this solar activity, in turn, may likely cause the 100,000-year climate cycles on earth. This research helps scientists understand past climate trends and prepare for future ones.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2002/06/020607073439.htm
Hope you enjoy them...
Orion Spitzer:
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/image/0608/orion_spitzer_f.jpg
NGC-2174:
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/image/0612/NGC2174_lrg.jpg
M-42:
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/image/0601/m42_hst_f.jpg
Orion Cradle:
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/image/0701/orioncradle_hallas_r.jpg
Wisps Surrounding the Horsehead Nebula:
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap080406.html
Markarian's Eyes:
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/image/0706/NGC4438_NGC4435_crawford_r.jpg
Carina Nebula Panorama from Hubble:
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/image/0704/carina_hst_big.jpg
Bullet Pillars in Orion:
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/image/0703/bullets_gemini_big.jpg
The Rosette Nebula:
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/image/0702/rosette_gendler_big.jpg
For individual descriptions of these images, go to the APOD archive page and run a search on the selected image's title:
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/archivepix.html
On average . . . how many of the Hubble photos posted hereon are natural colors?
Beautiful image in today’s APOD, and thanks for the link to yesterday’s posting...
Never heard of a ‘hoodoo’ before — it made me think of that riff from the flick, “The Bachelor and The Bobby-Soxer”.
