Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: MplsSteve
Maybe Lee .... Maybe

Lee was smart enough to knew that winning was a long shot against the North (who had more of everything) and that in order to succeed he had to take some long shots. This was a long shot, one that missed.

Recall also that the plan included a long cannonade of the Union line which was supposed to wreak havoc on the part of the line that Pickett was headed for.

The cannonade over shot the target and the plan fell apart.

19 posted on 07/03/2008 7:08:11 AM PDT by Michael.SF. ("They're not Americans. They're liberals! "-- Ann Coulter, May 15, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: Michael.SF.
When Lee had Stonewall Jackson at his side, he could take some long shots and they often worked out nicely. Jackson was killed about a month before Gettysburg, and I suspect that Lee was still thinking that high risk ventures were a smart and necessary strategy.

Also, if Jackson had been at Gettysburg and had suggested a move to the right, I suspect that Lee would have done so. Although Lee had great respect for Longstreet, when Longstreet suggested the move to the right, I think Lee held back, thinking that only Jackson could pull it off and that without Jackson, it was safer just to slam into the center.

An odd mixture of too much risk-taking and too much playing-it-safe. And yet, it might have worked.

21 posted on 07/03/2008 7:14:02 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Et si omnes ego non)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson