Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: mware

I think that striking at the center of the Union line was the only viable option left for Lee. He had struck on both flanks and came up with nothing.

But at the same time, it was not much of an option. He had to send his troops across an large open field where they’d be subject to artillery fire and then when closer, rifle fire.

The next question to ask is “What if Lee had made a clean and solid break in the Union line?” He didn’t have the troops to exploit that opening. Maybe he was counting (or hoping) that the Union army would not be able to mount a counter-attack due to the confusion.

Maybe Lee launched the attack because it would have been unfeasible for him to disengage and head back to Virginia. Maybe he trusted his troops too much. After all, they had rarely failed him in combat.

Who knows? But it’s all very interesting to consider the possibilities.


13 posted on 07/03/2008 6:54:02 AM PDT by MplsSteve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: MplsSteve
I recall the segment on the Civil War, I believe a link is at post #11, where Shelby Foote mentioned that there wasn't a soldier on the Southern side that didn't know that the charge was a mistake.

But they attacked anyway.

Kind of reminds me of the charges at Fredickburg by Union forces. I believe Joshua Chamberlain was in that battle too.

14 posted on 07/03/2008 6:57:45 AM PDT by mware
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: MplsSteve
Maybe Lee .... Maybe

Lee was smart enough to knew that winning was a long shot against the North (who had more of everything) and that in order to succeed he had to take some long shots. This was a long shot, one that missed.

Recall also that the plan included a long cannonade of the Union line which was supposed to wreak havoc on the part of the line that Pickett was headed for.

The cannonade over shot the target and the plan fell apart.

19 posted on 07/03/2008 7:08:11 AM PDT by Michael.SF. ("They're not Americans. They're liberals! "-- Ann Coulter, May 15, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: MplsSteve
There is a recent military history of Gettysburg that blames everything on the location of Lee's logistics train---that he had allowed it to get north of Gettysburg, and that turning it around would have taken a full day. He feared, it is argued, that the Union would attack his train in the process, leaving his troops without ammo and food. Don't know more about this interpretation---still have to pin down the details.

It's also worth noting, however, that Lee knew what the outcome of troops moving over open field to attack an entrenched position was, not only from watching the results on the Union army at Fredericksburg, but also from his debacle at Malvern Hill, where his own Rebel infantry charged emplaced guns over an open field. Lunacy.

27 posted on 07/03/2008 7:24:05 AM PDT by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: MplsSteve
I stated to you: the North (who had more of everything)

I should have qualified that by adding: "Except for a superior field Commanders at the begining of the war"

42 posted on 07/03/2008 7:54:05 AM PDT by Michael.SF. ("They're not Americans. They're liberals! "-- Ann Coulter, May 15, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson