Makes sense as a reasonable explanation for Big Brown's terrible performance in that race.
To: TexasNative2000
2 posted on
06/23/2008 8:04:09 AM PDT by
Eddie01
(one more for the road is actually a really bad idea)
To: TexasNative2000
Won’t discount it as a factor.
5 posted on
06/23/2008 8:06:20 AM PDT by
gate2wire
To: TexasNative2000
Why was nothing said about this earlier? Weren’t they paying attention then?
7 posted on
06/23/2008 8:07:50 AM PDT by
raybbr
(You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies start to vote!)
To: TexasNative2000
Seems that I have heard of such shenanigans in the past in order to adjust the final outcome of a race.
I am sure it was just coincidence.
On a multimillion $ thoroughbred.
On the biggest race of its career.
11 posted on
06/23/2008 8:09:05 AM PDT by
texas booster
(Join FreeRepublic's Folding@Home team (Team # 36120) Cure Alzheimer's!)
To: TexasNative2000
Let's see...how many millions of dollars did ordinary bettors lose on Big Brown? Over five million? More?
Nah. Nobody would've loosened a shoe on Big Brown on purpose...
To: TexasNative2000
I don’t see no picture. Where is it?
20 posted on
06/23/2008 8:15:30 AM PDT by
Phlap
(REDNECK@LIBARTS.EDU)
To: TexasNative2000
“All for the want of a horseshoe nail”
23 posted on
06/23/2008 8:16:27 AM PDT by
wordsofearnest
("The fundamental solution (w/b) that there is no longer any need to immigrate")
To: TexasNative2000
For the want of a nail, a crown was lost?
27 posted on
06/23/2008 8:17:51 AM PDT by
Bringbackthedraft
(If everyone stays home and no one votes will Congress disappear?)
To: TexasNative2000
So what’s Roger Clinton been up since his Alydar days?
29 posted on
06/23/2008 8:19:07 AM PDT by
Homer1
To: TexasNative2000
For want of a nail, a shoe came loose
For want to a secure shoe, a horse lost (badly)
For want of a horse, a triple crown was lost
For want of a triple crown, an ESPN-media orgasm was avoided.
47 posted on
06/23/2008 8:40:56 AM PDT by
bobjam
To: TexasNative2000
This might explain why BB was acting up a lot going into the first turn. Also, it was extremely hot here in New York that day (near 100 degrees).
48 posted on
06/23/2008 8:43:08 AM PDT by
ETL
To: TexasNative2000
If the shoe don’t fit, you’ve got to acquit!
51 posted on
06/23/2008 8:46:23 AM PDT by
TRY ONE
(NUKE the unborn gay whales!)
To: TexasNative2000
I can believe that they might have missed it at the time of the race. But i have a hard time believing that a loose shoe wouldn’t have been discovered in the time since the race.
54 posted on
06/23/2008 9:12:14 AM PDT by
jdub
To: TexasNative2000
You try running in flip flops.
60 posted on
06/23/2008 9:41:07 AM PDT by
wildbill
( FR---changing history by erasing it from memory.)
To: TexasNative2000
There’s an Earl Butz joke in here somewhere...
64 posted on
06/23/2008 10:04:50 AM PDT by
Doctor Raoul
(Fire the CIA and hire the Free Clinic, someone who knows how to stop leaks.)
To: TexasNative2000
"Makes sense as a reasonable explanation for Big Brown's terrible performance in that race."
No, it makes NO sense as an excuse for his performance. Losing a shoe is not an uncommon event in a race and has little effect on a horse's performance. Unless the shoe hits somebody behind the horse, most of the time nobody, most of all the horse, knows it's missing until returning to the barn.
70 posted on
06/23/2008 10:33:54 AM PDT by
penowa
To: Apple Blossom
95 posted on
06/23/2008 6:45:55 PM PDT by
bmwcyle
(If God wanted us to be Socialist, Karl Marx would have been born in America.)
To: TexasNative2000
96 posted on
06/23/2008 8:15:47 PM PDT by
TexasNative2000
(Is this tagline governed by McCain-Feingold?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson