[SmithL]

Morfordite Alert

You have been warned!

[mkjessup]

Morford’s anus is just itching due to the newest release of the Doc Johnson ‘marital aids’ catalog for June.

[avacado]

Give it up Morford! Your boyfriend left you on the alter and he isn’t coming back... Let him go...

[Right Cal Gal]

Maybe the young in SF or LA, but the “young” in my neck of the woods have all told me their against gay marriage.
Blacks and Hispanics are also against gay marriage.

In any event, all this is going to do is lead to a SCOTUS showdown on “full faith and credit.” And once SCOTUS says “nope, sorry, not gonna happen,” they’ll wish they hadn’t pushed the issue.

[AD from SpringBay]

His analysis is accurate - the strategy to normalize sodomy via mass media has been successful (haw haw - those zany, whackey queers on tha tee vee!). That, coupled with a refusal for many (NEA and far, far too many churches) to teach or emphasize ideas of absolute right vs. absolute wrong, have morally neutered large segements of our culture.

[RichInOC]

Markie...I’m 43. Try again.

[Lancey Howard]

LOL, “Mister Fister”.

[Flash Bazbeaux]

“it was largely a narrow and repressed and sexually unaware period “

Yes, from the dawn of man to the Stonewall Rebellion. An unaware period. But now we have nincompoops like Morford, who cannot write his way out of a wet paper bag, to “enlighten” us. Spare me.

[Caleb1411]

And hence the obvious conclusion: It's only because the "Greatest Generation" is finally dying off that something like gay marriage can be realized as less of a silly threat.

And hence the obvious response to Morford's wishful thinking: You think a preponderance of Californians will repudiate the California Marriage Amendment? Don't place any really large bets, Clark.

[johnny7]

“Homophobe”... one who reacts normally when confronted with gender-confused, human anomalies.

[Sgt_Schultze]

..we understand that allowing gay people to wed doesn't actually mean our shaky notions of God and family and society will collapse like a priest's willpower at a Boy Scout jamboree.

Har har! He mocks the notion of priestly molesters while ignoring the fact that it wasn't that they were priests that attracted them to Boys, it was that they were homos. He doesn't make the connection that almost without fail these "priests" (males) forced themselves onto boys (males) - the virtual definition of a homosexual rapist.

[Old Professer]

I would think that the best sociological reason against the practice of homosexuality is the fact that a human’s ovaries are not to be found anywhere in the alimentary tract.

[Nowhere Man]

Bzzzzzt! I'll be 42 next month, you lose Morford.

What people do in their own bedrooms is their business, I don't endorse homosexuality at all but I do realize that they do exist, I think there is some truth in both sides of nature vs. nurture. The thing I don't like is this quest for government recognition of homosexual marriage. If a church or religious body wants to recognize it, it is their right, but I would leave that church. Maybe government should not be in the marriage business with the exception of census taking for keeping a record, but it is involved and we have to live with it until if and when change comes. That said, if the homosexuals get their way, then I think it opens up the argument of recognizing other forms of marriage. It would be within the rights of a polygamist to what their marriages legalized. How about a guy who wants to marry his goat or a 1982 Buick? I know the proponents of homosexual marriage may not be pushing for people to marry goats, but it opens up the door for those who do.

We need to end tyranny by judges. If the proponents want homosexual marriage then go through the process of changing the law. Take few minutes and watch the old "Schoolhouse Rock" on how a bill becomes law. I'll be willing to even take it to the people for a referendum, ultimately, the people should decide. If we win, which I think is very much in our favor, so be it, but if we lose, well, that's the breaks, but at least we know where we stand instead of chasing after judges all the time.

[roses of sharon]

Farwell fags, your lifespan, and your inability to hold your feces in past 40 is evidence that you will never become old like the "phobes" you mock.

Enjoy!

[Baron OBeef Dip]

And that majority consists, by and large, of the young.

It's an intriguing — if slightly morbid — thing to note, because on the flip side, the poll also found that most people over age 65 don't like the idea of gay marriage one little bit because

And who votes more Morfordite?

Have fun in November!

[444Flyer]

http://www.ProtectMarriage.com/

[cherry]

"shaky notions of God and family and society will collapse like a priest's willpower at a Boy Scout jamboree."

more slams against the Catholic church, whose traditional tenets if followed are the most vocal against perverts,immorality, abortions, etc.....

Godless....valueless...meaningless.....a nothing culture with nothing to live for.....that's where we are headed....

sometimes I feel like we can't sink any lower...

I promise myself that I will not live among perverts, among satanists, among evil leftist.....if we have to move to Alaska and live in the bush we will...( or Montana or Wyoming..out in the dry country where nobody goes).

we would be pleased to have other God-fearing patriots join us, if it gets to that.....

[y6162]

“for the first time in state history, a majority of those polled said they support the idea of gay marriage and/or oppose a new and vile push for a state constitutional amendment to ban it outright. And that majority consists, by and large, of the young.”

Q. What do you call a politician that depends on the youth vote?

A. A loser.

[SunkenCiv]

Monkey Business
http://boknowsonline.com/2008/06/11/monkey-business/
Posted on 06/12/2008 11:48:12 AM PDT by fings
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2030032/posts