Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: UCANSEE2
Maybe Sarah couldn’t call Rosita. Maybe she wrote her letters, or possibly Sarah wrote them to someone else, and Rosita got copies.

So now Sarah is mailing letters as CPS is picking up the kids, and then also mailing them from the shelters. Yea, right.

IIRC, the adults denied there was any girl named Sarah at the compound.

No what you recall is that CPS said the adults denied there was any "Sarah" there. It was CPS that was looking for "Sarah", the Ranger was supposed to be looking for Dale, since they had an arrest warrant for him.

But what the FLDS adults may have denied was a 16 y/o Sarah, or Sarah "married" to Dale, who wasn't there. But we weren't there, and given how wrong the CPS has turned out to be on so many specific details, I'm not real inclined to believe they were telling the whole story.

52 posted on 06/09/2008 9:58:17 PM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]


To: El Gato

What I meant is that Sarah could have been writing letters over the past year, and Rosita used them when she started calling.


“No what you recall is that CPS said the adults denied there was any “Sarah” there. “

Accepted. CPS said the adults denied there was any Sarah there.


“But what the FLDS adults may have denied was a 16 y/o Sarah, or Sarah “married” to Dale, who wasn’t there. “

Maybe they were telling the truth, partially. Stating she wasn’t there, isn’t the same as saying she had never been there.
IIRC, CPS stated that the adults said she was never there.

I guess they were lying about that, or where they telling the truth?


“But we weren’t there,”

Yeah. That’s a major problem. None of us were there, and we have nothing so far but the reports in the media, and statements from the Sheriff, the CPS workers, the LE, the Governor, and all those other disreputable, and proven liars (/sarc)

Yet, the FLDS members made public statements. I had links to the interviews with three flds men, and three women.

They seemed confused, and several of them were obviously mentally retarded. That’s not a slam, just obvious.

One of the FLDS men stated that they didn’t even ‘know’ that child-bride practice was against the law.

When they admit they don’t know that something that is allegedly an integral part of their ‘doctrines’ supplied by Warren Jeffs, then it is reasonable to suspect it is being practiced.

Once again, we will have to wait for the LE and the courts to handle all this, so we can see the truth of what was really going on at the YFZ Ranch, even if the truth is that no laws were being violated.


53 posted on 06/09/2008 10:49:41 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (I reserve the right to misinterpret the comments of any and all pesters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

To: El Gato

And Thank you for your comments and the discussion, today and this evening.


55 posted on 06/09/2008 10:59:34 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (I reserve the right to misinterpret the comments of any and all pesters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson