Replies

What I meant is that Sarah could have been writing letters over the past year, and Rosita used them when she started calling.

“No what you recall is that CPS said the adults denied there was any “Sarah” there. “

Accepted. CPS said the adults denied there was any Sarah there.

“But what the FLDS adults may have denied was a 16 y/o Sarah, or Sarah “married” to Dale, who wasn’t there. “

Maybe they were telling the truth, partially. Stating she wasn’t there, isn’t the same as saying she had never been there.
IIRC, CPS stated that the adults said she was never there.

I guess they were lying about that, or where they telling the truth?

“But we weren’t there,”

Yeah. That’s a major problem. None of us were there, and we have nothing so far but the reports in the media, and statements from the Sheriff, the CPS workers, the LE, the Governor, and all those other disreputable, and proven liars (/sarc)

Yet, the FLDS members made public statements. I had links to the interviews with three flds men, and three women.

They seemed confused, and several of them were obviously mentally retarded. That’s not a slam, just obvious.

One of the FLDS men stated that they didn’t even ‘know’ that child-bride practice was against the law.

When they admit they don’t know that something that is allegedly an integral part of their ‘doctrines’ supplied by Warren Jeffs, then it is reasonable to suspect it is being practiced.

Once again, we will have to wait for the LE and the courts to handle all this, so we can see the truth of what was really going on at the YFZ Ranch, even if the truth is that no laws were being violated.

Sorry some of my sentences got short circuited. It’s real late, and I IZ TIRED.

When they admit they don’t know that something that is allegedly an integral part of their ‘doctrines’ supplied by Warren Jeffs, is illegal, then it is reasonable to suspect it is being practiced.

The fact that Jeffs took children and women from other FLDS sects in other states, and other countries (Mexico and Canada), to Texas, away from their husbands and families who he conveniently excommunicated because they wouldn’t swear an oath to cover his criminal acts, gives credence to the suspicion that he continued those practices in Texas.

Now, I agree, that is no proof.

But the state seems to think they have sufficient proof.
The Governor seems awfully confident.

We will see.