Posted on 05/29/2008 2:59:05 PM PDT by HAL9000
But don't you know that means that Vista has the marketshare over XP? And as we all know, marketshare equals superior product.
Create a new administrator account. Use that for updates, software installations, etc. Then change your old administrator account, the one with all your docs, email settings, internet access, and stuff, into a standard account.
Touch screen is not the technology being demonstrated by Microsoft or that is already being shipped by Apple. It is Multi-touch, the ability of the screen to sense and react to multiple contacts at the same time. Apple holds the patent on that.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
They should sue Microsoft then, and put Google on notice their new Android phone can't have those features either. At least that's my understanding of what patents are for, unless there's a cross-patent license or other agreement that's more important. Companies and groups that innovate should be protected and nurtured, while those that duplicate protected technologies should have to wait a lawful time or face penalty.
So far, there is not much to sue over on either potential product. Neither is shipping and Apple may be negotiating to license the patents.
They would have actually had to have innovated in the first place in order to cease.
Few ideas are completely in a vacuum, but Microsoft has added great value to some ideas. Right off the top of my head they produced the first decent mouse, and Photosynth takes VR photography to a whole new level (I've done VR photos, it was never this cool and easy).
Good points. Licensing is definitely the way to go, in this case Microsoft should license the patent if they have not already done so, and Apple should be allowed to charge whatever they want for it. Wonder what, if any, agreements currently exist between the two, any idea?
Often such information is very difficult to obtain, even when actual partnerships are publicly announced, but surely they have met and have some sort of agreement. The ultimate conspiracy theory is there's a full partnership, but that's not one I believe, and the exact state of the relationship is always something of great speculation. I'd say if Apple is doing most of the innovating, they should be reaping most of the profits, and if others such as Microsoft want to use the same patented features they should be paying a royalty. If they're not, why isn't Apple asking for it?
Microsoft's first mice were not noticeably different from Genius mice and the optical technology was acquired from Agilent Systems.
Photosynth was developed by Seadragon Software and acquired by Microsoft in 2005.
Microsoft is magnificent in leveraging their considerable war chest to buy innovation and putting on a fresh layer of shrinkwrap.
I tried Genius mice, and they weren’t as good. I also tried optical mice, but up to that point I remember them requiring a special mouse pad that had markings the mouse could pick up. The Intellimouse was still the first really good mouse I ever used.
Didn’t know that about Photosynth though.
Yep. Sun boxes had optical mice for a long time but you needed a special mouse pad.
The Intellimouse was still the first really good mouse I ever used.
I use Microsoft mice. I like them. But Microsoft didn't invent it. They, as per usual, acquired the technology elsewhere.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.