Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Political Left Needs Blacks For Trophies
Inverstors Business Daily ^ | 5/28/2008 | thomas Sowell

Posted on 05/29/2008 4:59:32 AM PDT by wyowolf

Years ago, when Jack Greenberg left the NAACP Legal Defense Fund to become a professor at Columbia University, he announced that he was going to make it a point to hire a black secretary at Columbia. This would, of course, make whomever he hired be seen as a token black, rather than as someone selected on the basis of competence. This reminded me of the first time I went to Milton Friedman's office when I was a graduate student at the University of Chicago back in 1960, and I noticed that he had a black secretary. This was four years before the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and there was no such thing as affirmative action.

(Excerpt) Read more at ibdeditorials.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Miscellaneous; Reference
KEYWORDS: sowell
Another article by Dr Sowell
1 posted on 05/29/2008 4:59:32 AM PDT by wyowolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: wyowolf

This one will leave a mark.


2 posted on 05/29/2008 5:03:29 AM PDT by norge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wyowolf

spot on too.


3 posted on 05/29/2008 5:08:22 AM PDT by SouthernBoyupNorth ("For my wings are made of Tungsten, my flesh of glass and steel..........")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wyowolf

It so happened that Milton Friedman had another black secretary decades later, at the Hoover Institution — and she was respected as one of the best secretaries around.


Sowell says in his article that at no time did Friedman refer to his secretary as a “black” secretary. My point is as long as we refer to someone as the “first black senator from...” or the “first African-American who...” we are still focused on race and not accomplishments.


4 posted on 05/29/2008 5:29:32 AM PDT by quintr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wyowolf

The problem with being a mascot is that you are a symbol of someone else’s significance or virtue. The actual well-being of a mascot is not the point.


from the article.


5 posted on 05/29/2008 5:31:46 AM PDT by quintr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wyowolf
Leaping to the defense of black criminals is another common practice among liberals who need black mascots. Most of the crimes committed by black criminals are committed against other blacks. But, again, the actual well-being of mascots is not the point.

I wish Dr Sowell would ticket with Dr Williams and run for the Whitehouse.

6 posted on 05/29/2008 5:35:32 AM PDT by laotzu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: laotzu

hell i would be happy if he served as some cabinate post... it would be nice to see someone who understands economics running things for a change..


7 posted on 05/29/2008 5:44:54 AM PDT by wyowolf ("we were the winners , cause we didn't know we could fail.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: laotzu

I wonder if he talking about a certain married couple as mascots that have been in the news lately?


8 posted on 05/29/2008 7:44:55 AM PDT by Dr. Ursus (( commander of the simian host))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson