[#1CTYankee]

"I know one of their guys in their auto group. I’d bet serious money he has more driving event track time than you do."

Now have I stated I have more driving event time?

How much more can you twist this?

The comparison was between the lame testers at Consumer Reports and C&D or R&T is a joke.
I'd bet my 80 yr. old uncle who raced at Daytona could still put them to shame.

[FreedomPoster]

You’re the one starting with the unsupportable comments. I’m thinking you’d soil your pants riding shotgun with my buddy at the wheel of, say, a C6 or a 911.

CR is geared towards the Middle America non-enthusiast driver, and works very hard at producing an impartial test.

C&D, R&T, and Automobile are all geared towards enthusiast drivers and, perhaps more importantly, their advertisers.

You’d have to expect some differences in output. Slamming CR because of that, with pure ignorance about their testers, is foolish. Both magazine types have their place.