To: JamesP81
No, I mean that the virus writers for those smaller platforms aren’t using Java as an exploitation tool - so that torpedoes your previous theory about just exploiting Java.
39 posted on
05/16/2008 1:29:30 PM PDT by
Spktyr
(Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
To: Spktyr
No, I mean that the virus writers for those smaller platforms arent using Java as an exploitation tool - so that torpedoes your previous theory about just exploiting Java.
And yet, the virus writers continue to not write many viruses for Apple. Because there aren't enough of them. Now, maybe some virus writers just get a kick out of taking down Palms, who knows. Nevertheless, I've worked on the innards of both Windows and Unix based operating systems. Unix based OS's are harder to hack, true enough, but it can be done. If OS X eventually gets a large percentage of the market share, we're going to find that it has a lot more security holes in it than people like to believe. And since it's FreeBSD based, if someone ever does break it they can pretty much do any damned thing you want.
So whether you like it or not, OS X doesn't have the security problems Windows does because not even nearly the effort has been put towards it and that, my friend, is a fact, claims about Casios and Palms notwithstanding.
63 posted on
05/16/2008 3:41:01 PM PDT by
JamesP81
("I am against "zero tolerance" policies. It is a crutch for idiots." --FReeper Tenacious 1)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson