To: ClearCase_guy
Personally, I don’t mind if Evolution is taught — but when non-believers are shouted down and punished for their apostasy, then I do have a problem. The problem scientists have is with a fundamentalist version of religion being forced into science classes under the guise of science.
What do you expect scientists to do when folks come claiming to be doing science, while at the same time violating all of the rules of science?
22 posted on
05/08/2008 11:15:01 AM PDT by
Coyoteman
(Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
To: Coyoteman
When Isaac Newton was doing science, he considered that there was likely to be a place for the Creator.
Since then, science has been re-defined -- specifically to exclude anything immaterial. Now, contra Newton, you are free to expell anyone who comes along "claiming to be doing science, while at the same time violating all of the rules of science" as you have freshly defined them.
How conveneient for you.
23 posted on
05/08/2008 11:18:53 AM PDT by
ClearCase_guy
(Et si omnes ego non)
To: Coyoteman
What do you expect scientists to do when folks come claiming to be doing science, while at the same time violating all of the rules of science? That's not what the movie is about.
How about allowing questions that the perverts can't answer? Is that Ok with you?
34 posted on
05/08/2008 4:42:17 PM PDT by
Publius6961
(You're Government, it's not your money, and you never have to show a profit.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson