* yawn *
Stupidest. Summation. Ever.
The message of this movie was anti-Science. Here Mr. Stein expounds upon his Science = Genocide formulation showing exactly where the message and audience of this propaganda piece are coming from.
Stein: When we just saw that man, I think it was Mr. Myers [i.e. biologist P.Z. Myers], talking about how great scientists were, I was thinking to myself the last time any of my relatives saw scientists telling them what to do they were telling them to go to the showers to get gassed
that was horrifying beyond words, and thats where science in my opinion, this is just an opinion thats where science leads you.
:::rolls eyes:::
Maryann, go take your medicine and report back to your rubber room.
Didn't Stein write about six years ago, postulating ways to ruin American competitiveness and innovation in the course of this century, that these ways would include:
Destroy the knowledge base on which all of mankind's scientific progress has been built by guaranteeing that such learning is confined to only a few, and spread ignorance and complacency among the many. Watch America lose its scientific and competitive edge to other nations that make a comprehensive knowledge base a rule of the society.Looks like Stein has voted for mysticism, tribalism, shamanism and fundamentalism.Elevate mysticism, tribalism, shamanism and fundamentalism...to an equal status with technology in the public mind. Make sure that, in order to pay proper (and politically correct) respect to all different ethnic groups in America, you act as if science were on an equal footing with voodoo and history with ethnic fable. (Source)
Best comment there:
“HITLER WAS A CREATIONIST”
http://www.nobeliefs.com/hitler.htm
Hold your arms out Richard, it makes it harder for them to throw the net over you.
I love it!
The perverts and their supporters keep reviwing a different movie than the one I saw. The Nazi reference was incidental, factual and less than 5% of the entire film.
The main subject, for normal viewers, is the "McCarthyist" behavior of academia against anyone who dares to ask questions they can't answer.
In a nutshell, that is the subject of the movie!
OK. This movie is about how the scientific establishment has ‘mccarthy’d’ those who do not follow the party (evolution) line. This is something its supporters say routinely, that it really isn’t about knocking down the ToE, or trying to bolster support for ID, it’s about how the scientific establishment treats its renegades.
Do I have that right?
If that is correct, can anyone explain the foray into Nazis and Eugenics and the attempt at linking the two with Darwin? How does that help making the point of the movie?
From a related thread...In 1987, The Supreme Court of the United States ruled that teaching creationism in public schools violated the separation of church and state in Edwards vs. Aquilard.
If anybody wants to see the USSC's bogus separation of church and state disappear before their eyes, a politically correct perversion of our constitutional religious freedoms that was wrongly legislated from the bench when the Court decided Cantwell v. Connecticut in 1940, then please read the following post. Note that while the post concerns a 10 Commandments issue it is also applicable to this thread.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1992174/posts?page=22#22The bottom line, as mentioned in the referenced post, is that the people need to reconnect with the Founder's division of federal and state powers, particularly where the wrongly ignored 10th A. power of the states to address religious issues is concerned, power now limited by the honest interpretation of the 14th Amendment. The people then need to get in the faces of renegade justices and do a major spring cleaning where USSC respect for our religious freedoms is concerned. President Lincoln put it this way.
"We the People are the rightful master of both congress and the courts - not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution." --Abraham Lincoln (Political debates between Lincoln and Douglas), 1858.