It’s not that the photo was doctored or that there wasn’t collateral damage, it is that the photo is obviously staged, as carefully as if it were for a magazine. For all we know, the child died the day before of disease and not in a missile attack. That is the kind of doubt such obvious staging imparts.
See post 17 above. I gave my opinion. The photo doesn’t look fake to me. Did the rescue workers lift the body higher for a better shot? I don’t know. Possibly.
To me, the real question is, as I asked before, was this child really killed by a U.S. missile attack? The way the photo is set up isn’t what makes me suspicious. What makes me suspicious are the other distortions of truth continuously put out there by our enemies.
But, keep investigating the photo. I’ll be interested to see what everyone comes up with.