To: cogitator
We need power at night, too, of course. Yes, but not as much. Until we come up with a feasible way to store massive amounts of renewable energy there is no reason solar cannot be used to offset the higher daytime loads.
7 posted on
05/02/2008 6:35:52 AM PDT by
Realism
(Some believe that the facts-of-life are open to debate.....)
To: Realism
Until we come up with a feasible way to store massive amounts of renewable energy there is no reason solar cannot be used to offset the higher daytime loads. Office buildings, for example, have much higher loads during daylight hours
8 posted on
05/02/2008 6:46:38 AM PDT by
PapaBear3625
("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." — George Orwell)
To: Realism
Yes, but not as much.During winter more is needed an night for heating than during the day, and that's when solar radiation is lowest.
Mind you, I think solar power will be an important component in our evolving national energy infrastructure. I was just facetiously pointing out the obvious problem.
To: Realism
Yes, but not as much. Until we come up with a feasible way to store massive amounts of renewable energy there is no reason solar cannot be used to offset the higher daytime loads.
If you use solar energy to melt salt (molten salt can be stored for hours), you can build a 24h solar plant with steam turbines just like a conventional power plant. Just google "Solar Tres".
11 posted on
06/15/2008 4:39:00 AM PDT by
wolf78
To: Realism
The technology is old and actually in place. Pumped stroage tied to a nuclear plant fueled with breeder reactor product does the job well.
13 posted on
06/15/2008 4:45:35 AM PDT by
bert
(K.E. N.P. +12 . The Bitcons will elect a Democrat by default)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson