Posted on 04/21/2008 9:11:20 AM PDT by Bobarian
JFK was killed by a bunch of gay republicans who did not like Cuba. It's in the JFK movie. Even J R Ewing was in on it ( see Stone's Nixon movie).
Since the guilt of the Rosenbergs (as defined by statute) has been proven beyond any doubt what is left for their defenders? That bigger fish got away? That they were morally and intellectually superior human beings and therefore not bound by the laws of a government established by slave-holding White males? (This is known in law as the Kathleen Soliah defense.)
The Left's Facorite Cute Couple
The Rosenbergs' execution is sometimes counted as a political blunder. These people ignore the rage at those who deliberately betrayed their own country, after 300,000 young men had been killed fighting a similar tyranny,
I've never been one for conspiracy theories, but that Kennedy was killed by the mafia for double-crossing them always seemed more plausible to me than Oswald as the assassin.
The mafia is a business. Killing the president is bad for business.
Venona, right. I checked it twice and still typed it wrong, thanks.
I guess it’s understandable that their children have never been able to confront the fact that their parents preferred to make orphans of them rather than rat out their Communist co-conspirators.
So Oswald was framed? --- just like the Rosenburgs? ;~))
I didn't mean to say that Oswald was innocent, rather that he wasn't alone...
Actually, they probably would have been spared if they merely apologized. They maintained an arrogant, condescending attitude that mitigated against clemency. Mostly Ethel. Julius was probably just henpecked.
Dude! That is harsh! LOL!
The History Channel was forced to apologize for airing them, and broadcast, DVD sales were halted. These were the last segments of the long ‘Men Who Killed Kennedy’ series, which I think were much more accurate than the Jennings Beyond Conspiracy that they are forced to air now.
***I recently watched The Kennedy Assassination: Beyond Conspiracy (on the History Channel). The computerized recreation of the Zapruder film makes a compelling argument that Oswald was the only shooter.***
If you ever stood in that window in Dallas, you would know that he could have done it all alone just as he almost did to General Walker a few weeks earlier. For anyone who ever handled a deer rifle, it was an easy kill.
A window frame saved Walker. Oswald had a clear shot at Kennedy. He didn't need any help and in his psycho mind, he had all the justification in the world.
Marxism was his motivation, mental illness was the reason. But I'm being redundant.
Forced by whom to apologize?
Forced by whom to air Beyond Conspiracy now?
Are the conspiracy buffs suggesting that the limo was rebuilt to move Connally six inches to the left and a few inches lower in order to disprove the Magic Bullet theory?
The whole issue is rapidly becoming moot anyway. I had that excellent Photoshop parody of Oswald being shot (Patsy and the Conspirators; Oswald on vocals, Jack Ruby on lead guitar) in my cube at one point. A co-worker in her late 20s didn't get the reference to one of the most defining images of the Boomer generation. (Yes, I felt old.)
I suspect the Kennedy assassination has no more relevance to the Gen Xers than the Lindbergh kidnapping does to Boomers.
Why they stopped with the Rosenbergs is beyond me.
The focus of the book is JFK's body.
Glamor and celebrity worship. Contrast the public image of the quiet older Eisenhowers and the younger party life of the Kennedys.
“If you want some very detailed information concerning multiple shooters read “Best Evidence” by David S Lipton.”
I have the first edition and the second edition that published the autopsy photos. In the company of a mutual friend, I also had dinner with David Lifton in 1986. I always felt that Oswald acted alone but after hearing Lifton speak for the entire evening I wasn’t so sure and have found myself wavering between the two camps ever since.
After listening to him over dinner, as one would expect, the question of “who did it?” arose. He also shared his theory on that, building a compelling case with the facts he cited. To this day still it still has me wondering.
Care to share what he said?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.