Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Phlyer
You are correct. Add to the cost difference of transporting Alaskan oil to the west coast versus Venezuelan oil to Texas (Lake Charles, LA)the fact that Alaska to the west coast is Us to US port and therefore regulated under the Jones act requiring ships to be built in the US and crewed by US. That runs the cost up a bunch. Alaska to Japan is cheaper transportation costs in less expensive though just as good ships.

Used to be there was not enough refinery capacity on the west coast for Alaska oil but as the oil exported has declined ( some storage tanks shut down a Valdez already) I'm not sure that is a problem now.

25 posted on 04/16/2008 8:41:56 AM PDT by dblshot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: dblshot

Now we certainly can not have US goods transported in US ships manned by US crews now can we. \Down with Globalists


27 posted on 04/16/2008 8:47:31 AM PDT by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: dblshot
Alaska to Japan is cheaper transportation costs in less expensive

You cannot travel that additional distance for less cost regardless of who crews or built the ship.


28 posted on 04/16/2008 8:49:47 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: dblshot

Alaskan crude was also tranported to Texas via tanker, trans Panama pipeline and tanker.


35 posted on 04/16/2008 8:56:24 AM PDT by Cold Heart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson